Why is there a "[sic]" in the title? After reading the post on Slashdot, I have the impression that we are talking about actual blankets. So the word is correctly spelled.
[sic] isn't used exclusively for spelling mistakes -- it means "thus was it written", aka. "this looks wrong, but it really isn't".
In this case, I think the intention is to make explicit that yes, they really are sending blankets.
In an office at the HR department at Google. The director: Someone tell me what we are going to do with the 3 thousand extra blankets we acquired for our 2012 employee bonus program? The smart guy: Why not give them to those developers who write open source software and give them for free? Those poor people must need blankets! People start to stand up and clap, slowly and firm.
They might be older than that. I used to participate in Google Answers (remember that?) circa 2002-2003 or so and even got certified to answer questions for cash. I got a polyester blanket embroidered with the Google logo as a christmas present for no reason.
Why is there a "[sic]" in the title? After reading the post on Slashdot, I have the impression that we are talking about actual blankets. So the word is correctly spelled.
The [sic] is in the original title on the /. submission, it was the author to use it. I think he meant "you read right, blankets".
The problem with quoting text that has a [sic] is a fun one.
Why is there a "[sic]" in the title? After reading the post on Slashdot, I have the impression that we are talking about actual blankets. So the word is correctly spelled.
[sic] isn't used exclusively for spelling mistakes -- it means "thus was it written", aka. "this looks wrong, but it really isn't". In this case, I think the intention is to make explicit that yes, they really are sending blankets .
Regardless, it's an unnecessary qualifier. Most readers here can take the leap of faith that yes, the title was written correctly, as they wait about 2 seconds for the link to load. Who cares, it's just a title, but all things being equal it should be removed.
How could Google e so callous as to reward people for their contributions. I realize polyester is a fabric of the devil, but I don't think a google is trying to convert anybody to the church of satan. Is it so hard to say "thanks" for an unexpected gift? (And to the mods, please remove the [sic]. Yes, it's in the original, but it's wrong and will certainly lead to clicks from people trying to figure out what was real…
> and will certainly lead to clicks from people trying to figure out what was really written.
raises hand, looks sheepish I couldn't figure out what word was close to "blankets".
My take on it is that Google is trying to advertise a well-paid fulltime position in their offices: "So you're an Open Source Dev? Surely you must be poor, thus: homeless, thus: here, have a blanket."