Live data from Hacker News

Here is today

hereistoday.com

31–40 of 116 posts

Re: Here is today

#31
post #5

I love these reminders that we are so very small and fairly new to this place!

And yet we seem to have accomplished so much, both in advancing humanity as well as in doing damage to nature.

We're just damaging the earth. Which is nothing.

We have a vision of the past, of the future, of a huge portion of the universe. And that's not nothing.

Re: Here is today

#32
post #6

Nice, although not very informative, since you somewhat loose perspective with each step.

Isn't that (loosing yourself in the grand scheme of things) the whole point of the animation ? A bit like Power of Ten [1] and Scale of the Universe [2] but with time instead of space. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fKBhvDjuy0 [2] http://www.htwins.net/scale2/

The problem with this one is that you actually don't lose yourself. Today remains highlighted and continues to occupy a pixel or two. Even the millennium vanishes next to epochs to preserve our bookmark on today. It's jarring, and completely ruined the effect for me.

Re: Here is today

#34
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's nice that it leaves you to draw your own conclusion, and doesn't preach or talk down to you, one way or the other.

Thanks! I like these scales, how small the Earth is, how young humanity is. But once someone starts preaching about how this means we are insignificant I lose interest quickly. If we are the only sentient life in the universe, then we are extremely significant in the grand scheme of things. If there was/is a god or another alien civilization from another universe, they would certainly conclude that the evolution of s…

You should stop and count the assumptions in your statement there.

Re: Here is today

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks! I like these scales, how small the Earth is, how young humanity is. But once someone starts preaching about how this means we are insignificant I lose interest quickly. If we are the only sentient life in the universe, then we are extremely significant in the grand scheme of things. If there was/is a god or another alien civilization from another universe, they would certainly conclude that the evolution of s…

You should stop and count the assumptions in your statement there.

Haha I count at least 7!

I guess what I wrote is entirely subjective, I wonder how many people would agree or disagree with my statement, or at least my feeling towards how others would view our sentience and life in general?

I really don't think humanity and life is insignificant even when we are small in comparison to giant stars and distances and short-lived in comparison to the age of the universe.

Re: Here is today

#36

What was before the universe?

1. The bigger universe that spawned us 2. The multiverse that generated us 2. The same energy that generated this universe 3. Everything 4. Nothing

Pick... some?

Re: Here is today

#37
...and 'hereis':

Service Temporarily Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. Apache Server at hereistoday.com Port 80

I hope you resolve this downtime as comments are favorable, and it appears interesting.

Re: Here is today

#38
post #16
post #14

I always wonder how scientists do know that something was 25, 540 million or 2.560 billion years ago.

Carbon Dating

Carbon dating is actually only effective up to about 50,000 years, so its really only ideal for tracking human history after we started migrating out of Africa. This is because the unstable carbon-14 isotope only has a half-life of about 5700 years.

There are many other forms of radiometric dating, though. Uranium-lead dating has proven relatively accurate for periods of time between 1 million to 4.5 billion years ago.

Note: I'm not a geologist. I remembered that carbon was only effective for a few thousand years from a geology course I had in college, but all of this information is actually taken from articles on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating

Re: Here is today

#39
post #25
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Carbon Dating

With out knowing, I some how got involved with carbon dating. I must have, I married a diamond..... Two reactions to that, either: ahhhhh sweeeeeeet, or I feel sick, pass me a bucket. So, up vote for sweet, or down vote for bucket. :) (Normally I like a Sunday rant. I feel different today)

Is this joke yours? It's great!
Post reply on HN