In my experience Dotcloud has the advantage of giving you more control over your instances and the ability to SSH into them. But I had issues with the reliability of deployment there. I used to love the sandbox, but I dropped Dotcloud as a provider after that was removed without a drop-in replacement. However, I still use them to serve Redis, and so far, it's way cheaper than using a dedicated Redis service. I looked…
> giving you more control over your instances and the ability to SSH into them. I thought the point of Heroku was not having to SSH into your servers?
Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
51–60 of 63 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#52try cloud66.com with digitalocean
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#53While on the topic, does anybody know any Heroku alternative that offers postgis, preferably at a more reasonable price than the 200$/month Heroku charge.
The biggest caveat is that you don't get integrated no-fuss horizontal scaling the way you do with their MySQL and MongoDB products.
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#54I like CloudBees (Java only). It's powerful, has high reliability and auto-scaling baked in.
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#55Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#56Does anybody have experience deploying Django to Elastic Beanstalk? I'd love to hear a comparison between them and Heroku.
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#57Meteor support is coming next week, and Rails will follow shortly.
(Disclaimer: I do work at Stackful.io)
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#58As far as Node.js is concerned, Stackful.io [ http://stackful.io ] provides an easy (and low-cost) way to deploy and scale your app on Digital Ocean SSD servers. Meteor support is coming next week, and Rails will follow shortly. (Disclaimer: I do work at Stackful.io)
Does Stackful offer the hard drive to use as we please? If so, you just got yourself a customer. (As soon as you support Rails)
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#59As far as Node.js is concerned, Stackful.io [ http://stackful.io ] provides an easy (and low-cost) way to deploy and scale your app on Digital Ocean SSD servers. Meteor support is coming next week, and Rails will follow shortly. (Disclaimer: I do work at Stackful.io)
Your 8$/month plan brings a tear to my eye. My ONLY gripe against Heroku is the lack of a hard drive to save things in, for example user uploads, etc. Does Stackful offer the hard drive to use as we please? If so, you just got yourself a customer. (As soon as you support Rails)
The $8 plan, for example, offers 20 GB SSD storage, and this includes files and database.
You can sign up, so we can notify you when Rails support is ready.
Re: Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
#60In my experience Dotcloud has the advantage of giving you more control over your instances and the ability to SSH into them. But I had issues with the reliability of deployment there. I used to love the sandbox, but I dropped Dotcloud as a provider after that was removed without a drop-in replacement. However, I still use them to serve Redis, and so far, it's way cheaper than using a dedicated Redis service. I looked…
> giving you more control over your instances and the ability to SSH into them. FWIW you can do: heroku run bash Which let's you mess around on a new dyno (not an existing one).