Live data from Hacker News

Strikingly, BuildZoom and Bitnami Lead Hottest Y Combinator Winter 2013 Startups

daniellemorrill.com

11–19 of 19 posts

Re: Strikingly, BuildZoom and Bitnami Lead Hottest Y Combinator Winter 2013 Startups

#13

Title needs an Oxford comma. (I first read "Strikingly" as a comment on how surprising it was that Buildzoom and Bitnami were leading.)

Definitely agree. I wonder if there's a cultural difference too. I'm pretty much a native English speaker and still fell for it.

Re: Strikingly, BuildZoom and Bitnami Lead Hottest Y Combinator Winter 2013 Startups

#15
Without a mapping of a company's score to its value, these ratings are non-sensical. Considering probably only public data is the input and the actual function isn't open, there is great reason to doubt the rating.

I've made a similar exploration of W13. My scoring is my personal biased judgement. The whole effort isn't to get a US News Top 100 list, but to better understand the rating system itself. http://blog.kirigin.com/angel

A simple thought experiment: how is this different from a random ranking? How would you know?

Re: Strikingly, BuildZoom and Bitnami Lead Hottest Y Combinator Winter 2013 Startups

#16

Title needs an Oxford comma. (I first read "Strikingly" as a comment on how surprising it was that Buildzoom and Bitnami were leading.)

I agree for the same reason; however, this is a matter of style and decision makers offer differing opinions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma

Re: Strikingly, BuildZoom and Bitnami Lead Hottest Y Combinator Winter 2013 Startups

#17
This dataset you're compiling gets less interesting with every new lens we look at it through. You're YC and you're 500S and there must be a way to get data nobody else has access to that really indicates growth and success - like headcount, who's hiring, the 'true' positions they're filling (vp of nobody?).
Post reply on HN