Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
blogs.scientificamerican.com
Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
1–10 of 100 posts
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#2They are just a "Like" farm. They use their tracking of likes to mine relationships so you can get personalized spam that appears that it came from your friends.
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#3Nor do they love science. Most of the things they post are not accurate. The picture of the universe and a synapse for example springs to mind. They are just a "Like" farm. They use their tracking of likes to mine relationships so you can get personalized spam that appears that it came from your friends.
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#4It's an Internet-wide problem, not just one FB group.
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#5Nor do they love science. Most of the things they post are not accurate. The picture of the universe and a synapse for example springs to mind. They are just a "Like" farm. They use their tracking of likes to mine relationships so you can get personalized spam that appears that it came from your friends.
What they're doing is cheering for the idea of science. It's similar to people cheering at a basketball game. They're not basketball players, so most of what they have to say about the topic is going to be wrong. But they're still rooting for you, and this is a good and powerful thing.
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#6Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#7I don't know if it's necessarily fair to call out "I F*cking Love Science". The same could be said about Reddit/9gag/thousands of other Facebook groups/etc. It's an Internet-wide problem, not just one FB group.
Lie is indeed "unfair" to him in some statistical sense, but I am absolutely not being "unfair" to him in a moral sense.
Or to put it another way, the reality of the Internet as you describe it is that a certain %age of copyright violations go unpurusued. It's a statistical model, just as it's a statistical model that a certain number of robberies are unsolved and a certain number of people are killed by lightening.
Is that unfair? It may seem so when you're being struck by lightening, but someone has to be struck by lightening.
Likewise, given enough copyright violations, someone is going to be called out. Today the blow falls on Elise.
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#8Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#9Not justifying the behavior, just saying that this example is the 'little guy'.
Re: Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not love artists
#10Nor do they love science. Most of the things they post are not accurate. The picture of the universe and a synapse for example springs to mind. They are just a "Like" farm. They use their tracking of likes to mine relationships so you can get personalized spam that appears that it came from your friends.
Are there any good articles that talk about this practice? Seems like that could be interesting...