Earlier quoted context omitted.
What underlying theory do you have in mind? It seems like Nietzsche's eternal recurrence to me.
I detect two theories relevant to HN readers. Spoilers ahead... . . . You have been warned... . The story moves towards a technological singularity [1]. This is a term Asimov could have been familar with at the time of writing. The name MULTIVAC is obviously inspired by the ENIAC and UNIVAC. So it's safe to assume Asimov was aware of the writings of Von Neumann. The unintended consequence of creating this artificial…
The Last Question
51–60 of 69 posts
Re: The Last Question
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Link for the curious: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=What+is+the+last+questi...
I think he meant https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=How+may+entropy+be+rev...
Re: The Last Question
#53Re: The Last Question
#54Re: The Last Question
#55Re: The Last Question
#56Re: The Last Question
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or Clarke's Childhood's End...
So very, very good. I would also recommend The Light of Other Days.
Re: The Last Question
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
On the Fields of Trenzalore, on the Fall of the Eleventh, when no living creature can speak falsely or fail to answer, a question will be asked...
Yes, but that's the first question in the universe, not the final question.
Re: The Last Question
#59Previously discussed on HN, including: Most comments, over a year ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3691113 4 years previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=595419
How poetic that this story be the one to be reposted and retold, again and again, until-
Re: The Last Question
#60What a waste of time that was! I felt greatly cheated by the ending. It was exactly as if I had met a friendly, neatly dressed, smiling person on the street who, after 5 minutes, turned out to be peddling his religion after all. Honestly, I have thought of much better stories myself. I remember GREATLY enjoying Asimov as a teenager, and I am pretty sure this is not his best story.
You have _thought_ of better stories yourself, but have you ever _written_ a better story. I'm pretty incredulous of anyone who claims to write better than Isaac Asimov. Strikes me the same way people who never built anything go around ripping on other people's products. Truly classic internet delusions of grandeur.
The delusion is yours : you don't know who you are talking to on the Internet, and you have assumed that the other anonymous writer is as mundane as you are. Says something about you, not me.
The irony of thinking, "Since I think Asimov / Steve Jobs / Linus / whoever is awesome, and so many other people agree, it MUST mean that the dissenting commentor is a troll or having 'delusions of grandeur'" is that when these people started out, I'm pretty sure self-appointed X Factor judges of the world future such as yourself told them exactly the same thing. "How deluded to think you can write an Operating System, you puny mortal, you Linus?!"
You are a follower, not a leader.
Edit : the person who wrote, "Asimov was an atheist. You misunderstood the story" is the one you have to learn from.