They should have released two different products. Chat Heads and Facebook Home. I think Chat Heads looks like a strong product (only from referencing the videos though, I don't have it). Without Chat Heads, would Facebook Home have been released to such a fanfare?
Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
11–20 of 87 posts
Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#12AKA, protest ratings. "This sucks in principle and I will never use it since Facebook is stupid."
Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#13They should have released two different products. Chat Heads and Facebook Home. I think Chat Heads looks like a strong product (only from referencing the videos though, I don't have it). Without Chat Heads, would Facebook Home have been released to such a fanfare?
It's been a while since webOS appeared and still noone has the easy of use it had for multitasking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c20uhGxSxWo
Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#14I tried it out but I found it too suffocating -- Facebook, like Google, wants their "feed" to be your main IV-line of info-tainment but in practice the vapid updates of friends mixed in with poorly constructed advertisements isn't very engaging. If someone makes Facebook Home for aggregated RSS feeds, than they've invented mobile crack and I will never be able to put it down. So maybe don't do that. Also, Chat Heads…
>If someone makes Facebook Home for aggregated RSS feeds, than they've invented mobile crack and I will never be able to put it down. So maybe don't do that. Reader?
I mean, if someone created a full lockscreen/homescreen replacement around the idea of my feeds and my content with the same polish and quality that Facebook did, that that would be my killer app.
Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#15They should have released two different products. Chat Heads and Facebook Home. I think Chat Heads looks like a strong product (only from referencing the videos though, I don't have it). Without Chat Heads, would Facebook Home have been released to such a fanfare?
I currently have Chat Heads installed w/o any Facebook Home integration, as does everyone else I know using Chat Heads.
Great feature (terrible name).
Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#16Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#17Re: Facebook Home over a week later: only 500K installs with a two-star user rating
#18I tried it out but I found it too suffocating -- Facebook, like Google, wants their "feed" to be your main IV-line of info-tainment but in practice the vapid updates of friends mixed in with poorly constructed advertisements isn't very engaging. If someone makes Facebook Home for aggregated RSS feeds, than they've invented mobile crack and I will never be able to put it down. So maybe don't do that. Also, Chat Heads…
Flipboard does quite a good job of grabbing content from multiple sources of your choice and displaying them in an attractive format. It's not a homescreen thing, but that's probably for the best. Do you really want non-urgent things shoved in your face constantly? Google Now has the most useful approach here, and I'm eager to see that developed even further. If you could populate it with selected RSS feeds, that wou…
This way essentially Flipboard-formatted RSS becomes your screen saver.