A Social Coding Experiment
github.com
A Social Coding Experiment
1–10 of 40 posts
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#2I'm interested in where this goes, if it goes anywhere. Seems like a cool concept, but only if the functions interact, and build upon one and other, not just print "Hi this is quaz3l! I defined a variable!".
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#3I'm interested in where this goes, if it goes anywhere. Seems like a cool concept, but only if the functions interact, and build upon one and other, not just print "Hi this is quaz3l! I defined a variable!".
I originally wanted to write an `incr(x)` function which increments a variable. However, it seemed to me that we needed to "print" something, so I think I added to the confusion by making a graffiti of sorts.
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#4I'm interested in where this goes, if it goes anywhere. Seems like a cool concept, but only if the functions interact, and build upon one and other, not just print "Hi this is quaz3l! I defined a variable!".
Taken to its logical conclusion, it will produce Emacs.
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#5I'm interested in where this goes, if it goes anywhere. Seems like a cool concept, but only if the functions interact, and build upon one and other, not just print "Hi this is quaz3l! I defined a variable!".
Taken to its logical conclusion, it will produce Emacs.
I hope no one adds the 'M-x skynet' mode, or we're all screwed.
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#6Disappointed that someone hasn't already slipped in:
exec requests.get('http://http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=fun_harmless_social_con...).content
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#7And lisp will be there
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#8anyone want to help with the merges? hit me up - sri [dot] umd [at] gmail
Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#9Re: A Social Coding Experiment
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Taken to its logical conclusion, it will produce Emacs.
I hope no one adds the 'M-x skynet' mode, or we're all screwed.
But we need of course C-x M-c M-butterfly [1].