21–30 of 87 posts
(I made a snapshot of the page from Google's cache only to discover that at least two others used the very same service within the last hour to do exactly the same...and there are a few services to snapshot web pages.)
Google cache of question in...question (lol): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FYBbAFU...
Google cache of question in...question (lol): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FYBbAFU...
That looks really horrible and I am somewhat tempted to write and publish a GreaseMonkey script that does bad things to CipherCloud protected pages...
DMCA as a law isn't even that ridiculous or reprehensible; it mostly offers protection for websites that have user-submitted content. And yet here we are.
The damages clause needs to be strengthened if we wish to continue having free speech on the internet.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The penalty for materially misrepresenting a DMCA claim is actual damages plus costs and attorney fees. That's automatic, written into the bill, unlike many other torts/crimes where you need exceptional circumstances to get attorneys fees in addition to the damages.
Except that 512(f) of DMCA is practically unenforceable [1], since the standard is to prove that they "knowingly materially" misrepresented: [1] http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/04/another_512f_cl...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That looks really horrible and I am somewhat tempted to write and publish a GreaseMonkey script that does bad things to CipherCloud protected pages...
Why would you (or anyone) deliberately try to hurt a company? Just because their tech is not 'on par'? Please think about how it would hurt that company and the employees (and their families!).
Just have someone put it on wikileaks?