Live data from Hacker News

News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

m.guardiannews.com

191–200 of 245 posts

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#191

I've come to a similar conclusion. Because news emphasizes the dramatic over the contextual, they're always providing me poor information in an even poorer context. That's just the way the business works. I've done something weird, though: I switched to plaintext commentary. So each day I scan my personal news site, http://newspaper23.com . It only does commentary. I find that by scanning the titles I can see what ne…

Your argument rests on the flawed premise that the reader is a passive fool waiting to be spoon-fed their morning panic ration. An article may be the top story of the day, but that doesn't mean it is important or relevant to me. Clearly there is a "news cycle" and every day there must be some top story. The reader is not compelled to pay heed. The discriminating reader does not perceive a newspaper to be some distill…

> Your argument rests on the flawed premise that the reader is a passive fool waiting to be spoon-fed their morning panic ration.

Is this really so flawed, at least in aggregate? Large parts of our society judge people by their awareness of these wider events over which they have no control, and by the value judgments they make concerning those events. When this is what it takes to be considered a good person, people will line up to do it: passively waiting to be spoon-fed their morning panic ration, just as you describe.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#192
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Try http://skimfeed.com . 60 news sources, 10 titles each, one page, all text.

I like this, great on my iPad. Any plans for a mobile version? Also, what do you the stars signify? And I think Lifehacker is showing double links.

Thanks! Still working the kinks out of the design before building out a mobile version. Soon.

Stars mean it's new (last x hours, x is adaptive). Checked and yes lifehacker is showing double links...should fix itself...no idea why... :)

Drop some feedback in the box under the title if you want anything added/removed/changed.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#193
I completely agree. I have cut nearly all ordinary news from my life. I read domain-specific news, industry news, news from various little corners of interest, and occasionally glance at the headlines just so I have some clue of what's going on in the world. But ordinary "if it bleeds it leads" news is generally one of: (1) sensationalism, (2) government propaganda, (3) corporate propaganda, (4) veiled advertising, or (5) filler.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#194
News isn't necessarily bad for you, and it's not a good idea to live in a bubble of cherry-picked information. However, the mainstream news is fraught with all kinds of problems so you need to be prepared to believe that what appears there is at best a partial picture of the events. The phenomena of churnalism also illustrates that it's easy to believe that what looks like impartial information is actually just crudely re-arranged press releases from particular companies who likely have a vested interest in the content and framing of the story.

So don't switch off the news entirely, lest you fall into a state of general ignorance about wider events, but be prepared to interpret it critically.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#195
I think the problem is a little more nuanced than watching news or not watching news. It has to do with what media scholars call agenda setting theory.

That is, media can't always persuade us to believe in a story, but they're very good at persuading us to think about a story. News sources like Fox, MSNBC or CNN might dwell on 3-5 leads in a day. Because they're so ubiquitous and influential, they might make you concentrate on (even debate) an issue that has little relevance to your life.

The solution is not shut out news altogether, but to consciously seek out sources of news that are relevant to your interests and your community.

It's analogous to consuming food: if you pay attention to what you're taking in and where you're getting it from, you'll feel a lot happier and healthy.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#196
post #179
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And what exactly is the difference you find between those who watch news and those who don't? Besides being able to talk about latest news themselves, of course.

One of the absolute curses of the internet is that it has near-completely killed off the ability to speak in metaphor.

I truly don't find your metaphor (if it can be called that at all) apt, thus my question.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#197
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mass media focus on drama not in information; so your emotions are appealed more than rational thoughts. You can't do nothing about the North Korea crisis even if you watch the news, that's a "Reality check".

That's right, jQueryIsAwesome, jQuery is awesome in Palo Alto. And you can do nothing about North Korea. And you don't care about North Korea, because the only thing you care about is Palo Alto, its organic restaurants, its girls, and, of course, jQuery. But NK isn't going away. And you, American kids, can stick your heads in Palo Alto sand, and assume that all is good, and by not knowing what's out there, you will m…

I'm Colombian, like, live in Colombia/South America.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#199
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cheers. Crazy, or maybe just misinformed. Thanks for enlightening me. (no sarcasm) Guess I'll think twice before posting something positive about HN from now on.

There are a lot of positive things about HN, without it being "real news". The major value for me is that it is (often) interesting . I learn a lot here that helps me find new ways to think about technology and the web industry. But it is not: * neutral: there are some pretty obvious biases, though they aren't consistent * need-to-know: there's nothing I've learned on HN which has been strictly necessary to me, thoug…

It's really funny, because HN is much like slashdot at it's high point (I would argue it's even better). Many parallels exist; for example, people will claim "groupthink" (in this case "bias"), but minimize "inconsistencies" when they disprove their point.

As for need to know, might I be so bold as to suggest that if you haven't learned anything of use at HN, perhaps it's not suited for your interests/profession?

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#200
post #187

With 7 billion people in the world, it's very likely that these things will happen today: - someone will get killed in a horrible car accident - a child will be killed in a freak accident - someone will die from cancer, leaving much grieving behind - someone will molest a child - someone will lose all their money in a scam - someone will get raped - someone will be killed by a never-to-be-found hit-and-run drunk driv…

What's the list for Hacker News?
Post reply on HN