My Time at Lehman
nickchirls.com
My Time at Lehman
1–10 of 198 posts
Re: My Time at Lehman
#2Re: My Time at Lehman
#3Re: My Time at Lehman
#4Re: My Time at Lehman
#5I mean, I'd like to think I would be able to make that choice and that purpose and meaning would ultimately trump a large paycheck. But nobody's putting $250k+ in my pocket so it's genuinely hard to say.
Kudos to Nick for leaving. It took guts.
Re: My Time at Lehman
#6Others will read this and think: "holy crap man, the people that are screwed by the company still make just under a million! I totally want to work on wall street. I'll be rich"
It's a jungle out there
Re: My Time at Lehman
#7some will read this and think: "disgusting. thanks for the honest appraisal of what it's like... and it's disgusting." Others will read this and think: "holy crap man, the people that are screwed by the company still make just under a million! I totally want to work on wall street. I'll be rich" It's a jungle out there
Re: My Time at Lehman
#8Yes, there are people on wall street that hate their jobs. Yes, there are people obsessed with money. That's easy to point out. But there are also some people that are there because they like working with their friends and making big bets, and getting proven wrong or right. It's actually similar to the culture of being a contrarian that I see in SV. And as to the point where the guy felt shorted by a million dollar bonus, wouldn't you feel shorted if you made the company 10x that in profit on your trades, and all your friends at other firms that made 10x got a bigger check than you? That's human nature, not something specific to wall street, even if it's easy to throw up your hands and say how shocking it is because of the amounts involved.
Anyway, I don't mean to be overly harsh on the article. It's possible my additional time there put some blinders on, and I still have a lot of friends that work on the street (a good percentage of whom actually like their jobs). It was really interesting to get Nick's perspective, and it's especially awesome that it's from someone else who has jumped over to startups from wall street. Just throwing my 2 cents in.
Re: My Time at Lehman
#9"'We are important providers of liquidity that create stable financial markets. We’re a crucial part of a system. And besides, if we don’t do it, someone else will.' These are the lies that people tell themselves so that they can buy larger homes."
Both of these things are completely true, and that's why American public policy is having such a hard time grappling with Wall Street. We try to rationalize the state of affairs by pointing out all the ways that Wall Street has an "unfair advantage" but the fact of the matter is that: what do you expect in a free market system that rewards every marginal advantage other than wealth to flow from less sophisticated people to more sophisticated ones? We like the idea of letting everyone transact freely, but we are uncomfortable with the "winner take all" implication of that policy.
Wall Street: 1) Hires some of the brighest people in the country (e.g. 40% of the author's class at Yale); 2) Aggressively weeds out that impressive pool by forcing out all but the most promising people within a few years; 3) Trains them rigorously and maintains a level of institutional knowledge transfer that tech companies can only dream of.
Why are we surprised that they disproportionately get the better end of every transaction?
Re: My Time at Lehman
#10I think I like his parents :-)