I have no particular love for Mark Zuckerberg, but really, there's nothing to see here. The system is working.
Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
21–30 of 47 posts
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#22I find it interesting that Facebook wont hire a kid with a degree from a community college here in the US, but will fight tooth and nail to hire someone with a degree from an Indian college that Mark probably couldn't pronounce the name of.
Data? Source?
http://www.cjr.org/reports/what_scientist_shortage.php?page=...
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#23Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#24It's interesting how its always management that wants immigration reform; not the workers. On the one hand, it is management that does most of the hiring and are the ones tasked with finding talent. On the other hand, they're also tasked with keeping budgets low...
I'm curious to know how you arrived at this conclusion? How many h1-b workers or students on f-1 visas have you actually spoken with that do not want immigration reform, because I can tell you that I've lived that life and know close to a hundred of those people and even though its a small sample size I don't know any of them that think the current state of immigration with respect to skilled workers is okay.
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#25Zuckerberg is not in a bubble...he has been meeting with immigration policy experts for years. He understands his role in the national immigration debate, and he is playing it very well. Many people have the goal of comprehensive immigration reform. To get it accomplished will take a lot of pushing from a lot of different directions. Zuckerberg, as the CEO of one of the most famous "new economy" innovative companies,…
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#26However, my view is that not everyone, regardless of education, can be good software engineer. Almost all software engineers I know used to be very top at mathematics and science since the very first year of primary school. They didn't receive any superior education, but researched and learned things by themselves, very often against a lot of things that stood in their way, like no access to internet or much more obligations (like helping family on the farm) than kids in America.
Nowadays, when it is getting much easier to learn anything being anywhere in the world, just being born or educated in the USA loses it's value.
Remember, that USA is just about 5% of world population.
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#27Ok that's absurd. The economy today (and in the future) is based on resources. Period. It takes resources to produce ipads, food, sheets, clean water (even dirty water), cars, soap, condoms, films, power, etc, etc.
I mean, why do you think we maintain our huge Army? It's our abundance of resources that allow us and Zuckerberg to do what we/he does. And now out in the field gathering food.
Even when it all comes crashing down. It'll be a race for food, water, and salt. Not a race for webapps.
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#28I find it interesting that Facebook wont hire a kid with a degree from a community college here in the US, but will fight tooth and nail to hire someone with a degree from an Indian college that Mark probably couldn't pronounce the name of.
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#29One of his arguments in my opinion is invalid. He tries to suggest that if USA would simply invest in education, especially in middle America, then USA would produce enough engineers to not have to import engineers from abroad. However, my view is that not everyone, regardless of education, can be good software engineer. Almost all software engineers I know used to be very top at mathematics and science since the ver…
Re: Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Data? Source?
"Leading experts on the STEM workforce, including Richard Freeman of Harvard, Michael Teitelbaum of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Paula Stephan of Georgia State University, Hal Salzman of Rutgers, Lindsay Lowell of Georgetown, and Norman Matloff of the University of California-Davis, have said for years that the US produces ample numbers of excellent science students. In fact, according to the National Science Boar…
says that only 10% are involuntarily not employed in their field.