Live data from Hacker News

Sphinx 0.9.9-rc2 is out

sphinxsearch.com

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Sphinx 0.9.9-rc2 is out

#11
We looked at Sphinx but ultimately decided to use Solr/Lucene instead. There were a couple reasons:

* We're not doing fulltext search, but searching by a set of tags that we didn't want tokenized/stemmed. Doing this with Lucene was easy, while trying to get Sphinx to work this way really seemed like it was going against the grain.

* The incremental update support seemed a whole lot simpler in Lucene than it was in Sphinx. The exact same stuff might be going on under the hood, but adding new documents seems to "just work" in Solr with less worrying about the implementation details.

From everything I've seen, Sphinx's performance is excellent and it's very well-suited to fulltext search. It just seems a little less flexible than Lucene.

Re: Sphinx 0.9.9-rc2 is out

#12

Anyone implementing sphinxsearch care to share their experience with us?

Sure. We're using it for a couple things.

It scales relatively well, though I wish we were getting sub-minute indexing, I'm pretty pleased with the 45 minute timespan we're seeing on a pretty large dataset.

Responses are quick, though I'm having a some problems with memory usage on my MBP, I've mostly fixed that with careful configuration.

Biggest problem is that django-sphinx is a piece of trash. I had to hack together a custom wrapper that we might consider open sourcing at some point.

Post reply on HN