Live data from Hacker News

Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 35 posts

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#21
post #11

people working on appengine really want java? Isn't write webapps in java unproductive? I would figure developers would rather have ruby,php instead.

JRuby is in good shape, you can deploy Rails on it.

And besides, there are many people with investments in Java already. I think this is a pretty good choice.

Now, if they also added Mono (.NET) that would be great.

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#22
post #11

people working on appengine really want java? Isn't write webapps in java unproductive? I would figure developers would rather have ruby,php instead.

Try writing a high throughput webapp in ruby or php, then come back.

Java is orders of magnitude easier to scale.

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#23
post #11

people working on appengine really want java? Isn't write webapps in java unproductive? I would figure developers would rather have ruby,php instead.

JRuby is in good shape, you can deploy Rails on it. And besides, there are many people with investments in Java already. I think this is a pretty good choice. Now, if they also added Mono (.NET) that would be great.

Google adding support for Microsoft tools?

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#24
post #7

Hmm I'd like to see JRuby running on app engine. Who else would?

I wonder if it will run all Java bytecode. Scala and Clojure would be great. Plus PHP (via Quercus) would convert a lot of developers. Edit: looks like it should! http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/runtime.html App Engine runs your Java web application using a Java 6 JVM in a safe "sandboxed" environemnt. App Engine invokes your app's servlet classes to handle requests and prepare responses in this environmen…

Don't forget Jython!

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#26
post #22
post #11

people working on appengine really want java? Isn't write webapps in java unproductive? I would figure developers would rather have ruby,php instead.

Try writing a high throughput webapp in ruby or php, then come back. Java is orders of magnitude easier to scale.

Languages don't scale.

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#28
post #11

people working on appengine really want java? Isn't write webapps in java unproductive? I would figure developers would rather have ruby,php instead.

HN etiquette note:

The parent post is neither a troll, spam, or off-topic, and thus should not be downvoted.

A simple "no upvote" would suffice. If you disagree add a substantive rebuttal to your "no upvote".

Re: Google AppEngine Java Support Launches

#29
post #28
post #11

people working on appengine really want java? Isn't write webapps in java unproductive? I would figure developers would rather have ruby,php instead.

HN etiquette note: The parent post is neither a troll, spam, or off-topic, and thus should not be downvoted. A simple "no upvote" would suffice. If you disagree add a substantive rebuttal to your "no upvote".

How do you define troll? A blanket statement labelling an entire technology with a pejorative without any justification or explanation seems fairly trollish to me.

However both of us are certainly off-topic and should be downvoted heavily :-)

Post reply on HN