I always wondered why nobody else seemed to follow the lead of Lotus 1-2-3 for Windows. Use "save" and "load" icons that portray arrows pointing to and from folders [1]. Never have to worry about a floppy again. Turns out, these guys just did that. Except with documents [2] and clouds [3] instead of folders. Guess iOS did away with those. [1] - As seen in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lotus_1-2-3_9.8_Windows.p..…
but wtf is a "folder", now?
Redesigning the Save Symbol
41–50 of 72 posts
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#42A "phone" these days is usually, more or less, a small box with one glowy side. Yet these self-same devices, to represent "phone", use the silhouette of the handset from an old Bell Telephone landline model, thirty years after those phones went out of fashion. To even the younger generation, that shape means "phone", even if it doesn't look like a phone. Similarly, the D-pad from a NES controller -- or worse, an Atar…
http://sl.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/1b22bl/i_was_cleaning_...
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#43What's so bad about a floppy disk icon? Even if the kids today don't know what that is, they still know the icon means save. We recognize a pawnbroker's symbol or a barber pole without knowing where they came from.
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#44Computers should never lose your work, you shouldn't have to instruct it.
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#45The save symbol doesn't need to become universally known like radiation and biohazard. The concept won't need to be known in another decade.
... which I suppose one can see coming from a mile away, but I really hope it doesn't become ubiquitous.
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#46If you have a universal cultural idiom, I think it means you won the war of conveying a concept.
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#47Maybe I'm getting old, but seeing conversations like this irritate me. All I see in that wall of text are activity indicators, upload icons, and "TO THE CLOUD!!!" icons. Internet Comment Designers seem to think that skeuomorphism (a word they love using to tell the world 'LOOK, I KNOW BIG WORDS SO I MUST BE GOOD AT THINGS') must always be a bad thing...as if using the icon to save as a floppy disk is somehow less con…
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#48App should just save automatically. Usually when people use save, they actually want to take an action. (ie: exporting the file somewhere, sending it to someone, etc.) This thread should focus on identifying those actions and finding more universal ways to make them ubiquitous. What if there was a universal "send this" or "invite someone to collaborate" button?
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#49everyone is only 1 billion people with a USA influenced cultural history and a Microsoft influenced PC history.
FirefoxOS stands a good chance of reaching a new billion people, and some mobile device will, and what will the chinese-ubuntu choose for save? There are going to be 10bn people alive in 2050 (I hope!) and 9bn of them have not seen a floppy disk icon.
It might be that we stick with the icon and everyone starts spelling skeuomorphism wrong. But is it likely?
So I quite like the discussion shown here. There are a couple of good ideas. And the new devices, then new mental models of synching local and remote storage, are going to need new iconography. Will these guys do it? Only if they buy a domain, produce high quality glyphs with open discussions, make it free and blog about it incessantly - then maybe when the next big thing comes along, they might just reach out and take the easy icon set. That would be nice.
Re: Redesigning the Save Symbol
#50App should just save automatically. Usually when people use save, they actually want to take an action. (ie: exporting the file somewhere, sending it to someone, etc.) This thread should focus on identifying those actions and finding more universal ways to make them ubiquitous. What if there was a universal "send this" or "invite someone to collaborate" button?
Then you would have to have millions of buttons for the millions of things people do with files. The beauty of the filesystem is that a single function (save) can be extended by other programs into many things. (Source control, file transfer, editing in another program, ect.)
Though you would need to worry about atomicity when having a file open in two editors constantly "auto-saving" the document; you'd need some way to synchronise state. Probably easiest to make file write access exlusive by default.