131–140 of 241 posts
Does anyone know what on earth is Play! doing that makes it is so slow? I'd like to see Lift in there if you guys do another round.
Kind of curious why jruby doesn't provide more of a boost (especially given compojure doing relatively well, too) and would like to see Django+Jython in version 3 (and +1 to the .NET/Mono stuff)
As an amateur hacker and after 275 days of reading Hacker News I feel I can now navigate in the sea of client side Javascript frameworks. With the introduction of this data on web framework performance, I now have another set of choices that I am completely unqualified to comprehend. My first impression is that this data shows about 3 levels of web frameworks. At the bottom (slowest) we have Django's and Rails and ma…
IMO if you build a product and it is working, there really is not much reason to redo your efforts in a higher performance framework unless your needs require you to do so. If you are at your current hardware's limits and you can't throw more hardware at it (for whatever reason), it may make sense in that case. If you want to reduce the amount of servers you currently have, it also makes sense there. http://blog.iron…
It's a useful data point to know the speed of frameworks, but what matters most to me is speed of development and whether or not I enjoy the process. Wish there was a way to benchmark those points.
I 100% agree with this. It has been a huge point of discussion for us here internally. "Developer efficiently with language x." Ultimately, language performance does matter but there are ways to make up for less performant languages. If it takes you 2x as long to get something out the door though, then that is a huge problem. Just use the language and framework you are most efficient in and enjoy using. Worry about f…
Does anyone know what on earth is Play! doing that makes it is so slow? I'd like to see Lift in there if you guys do another round.
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...
Compare this to the Java Servlet, which just serializes directly in the Servlet callback.
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...
The former seems like overkill.
Is it against the rules to use different workers for Django or Flask? In other words, there's a big difference when I run things with Gunicorn+Gevent+psychopg (PostGres async driver) than when I run it just with Gunicorn alone.
I find the lack of Erlang frameworks disappointing.
Instead, find it motivational. :) They are accepting pull requests.
We'll be including this in the next round.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/mast... See php.ini, php-fpm.conf.
I could be missing something, but it looks like you are using the default settings. Have you tried tweaking it all? Specifically setting apc.stat=0, which will stop it from checking the mtime. You'll need to clear the cache with apc_clear_cache() when you make code changes though. You may also want to look at apc.php to check for fragmentation and adjust apc.shm_size if necessary
Very interesting - again. What I - again - find most interesting, is the large discrepancy in the 20-query test. Common wisdom seems to be that language performance is not important b/c every language hangs in the same IO/DB.