Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
41–50 of 61 posts
Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#42Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is also mighty practical for interplanetary missions. Specially the ones that require landing and return trips. You can't realistically get the entire contraption + all the required fuel and engines up into orbit in one go. It is just too heavy. It is considerably more practical to send the mission up into orbit in smaller chunks, then reassemble it and optionally refuel at an orbital station, before you begin the…
I'd like to second the "practicality" angle; I couldn't muster enough fuel and thrust to get a 2-module space station (two Hitchhiker modules) into orbit without the rockets blowing apart from instability. But the single-module guy is cruising along just fine right now. Rocket science: Apparently it's hard. Who knew?
Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd like to second the "practicality" angle; I couldn't muster enough fuel and thrust to get a 2-module space station (two Hitchhiker modules) into orbit without the rockets blowing apart from instability. But the single-module guy is cruising along just fine right now. Rocket science: Apparently it's hard. Who knew?
This warrants the obligatory XKCD quote[1]: "Space is hard" [1]: http://what-if.xkcd.com/38/
Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd like to second the "practicality" angle; I couldn't muster enough fuel and thrust to get a 2-module space station (two Hitchhiker modules) into orbit without the rockets blowing apart from instability. But the single-module guy is cruising along just fine right now. Rocket science: Apparently it's hard. Who knew?
This warrants the obligatory XKCD quote[1]: "Space is hard" [1]: http://what-if.xkcd.com/38/
Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#46Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#47Can anyone explain as to what this game provides over the well-developed Orbiter ( http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/ ) aside from the build-your-own-space-launch-system angle?
Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#48I don't see it mentioned in the comments but those interested in realistic space flight simulation should check Orbiter [1]. Orbiter tries to be as physically accurate as possible by using accurate drag models, elliptical gravity (no circular orbits) and many other interesting features. It has a large community behind it and is scriptable with Lua. I have only played with it for a couple of days and I am impressed by…
I found Kerbal to be a good stepping-stone to Orbiter. Kerbal is more instant-gratification, but it lacks the realism that I've come to love from Orbiter.
I've learned a ton about spaceflight from playing Orbiter. It makes watching real launches much more interesting, since you will actually know what's going on.
Start out with the built-in Delta Glider. Once you're comfortable with that, download the XR2 Ravenstar from http://www.alteaaerospace.com/ (free). It's a much more advanced craft with more bells and whistles to play with, but it's also a bit more challenging to fly.
Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#49Re: Kerbal Space Program - space flight simulator game
#50Am i the only one who read this as Kernel Space program ?