You should show us the cpu usage. If you had done so, you would have found how absurd the mistake you had make.
Web Framework Benchmarks
371–380 of 415 posts
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#372How can you write a web framework benchmark and not include some of the non mainstream languages with probably the most performant frameworks like Erlang (Cowboy, Mochiweb), Haskell (Yesod, Snap Framework)? That's just wrong; anyway.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#373Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure many people would use webgo in real life. I don't know... maybe some people... certainly not pros. Also, the 1.0.3 thing is probably dragging on the numbers a bit. 1.1 would boost it a little. Not enough to get it into the top tier... but a little. Also, for Vert.x, they seem to be only running one verticle. Which would never happen in real life. Play could be optimized a bit... but not much. What they h…
The Play app uses MySql in a blocking way, while Nodejs uses mongo. It's not comparable.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#374Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's wrong with that guy?
He's a fantastic software engineer but he is _very_ abrasive. I've read some of his posts claiming he would fight some other developer in person at a conference if he steps up. He would rent out a ring and he would put his yellow belt to practice. Really, I'm not making this up. He sounds like a jerk to work with.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#375Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure many people would use webgo in real life. I don't know... maybe some people... certainly not pros. Also, the 1.0.3 thing is probably dragging on the numbers a bit. 1.1 would boost it a little. Not enough to get it into the top tier... but a little. Also, for Vert.x, they seem to be only running one verticle. Which would never happen in real life. Play could be optimized a bit... but not much. What they h…
The Play app uses MySql in a blocking way, while Nodejs uses mongo. It's not comparable.
We tested node.js with both Mongo and MySQL. Mongo strikes us the more canonical data-store for node, but wanted to include the MySQL test out of curiosity.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#376Earlier quoted context omitted.
The play test was written totally incorrectly since it used blocking database calls. Since play is really just a layer on top of Netty it should perform nearly as well if correctly written.
But Play's trivial JSON test was much slower than Netty's.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#377Would've loved to see http://servicestack.net on this list which has great performance on .NET and Mono: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Real-world... And also maintains .NET's fastest JSON and Text Serializers: http://theburningmonk.com/2011/11/performance-test-json-seri...
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#378Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#379Where is ASP.Net MVC? Odd that you list obscure frameworks like Wicket and leave out one of The Big Four frameworks. (The big four in my book are: ASP.Net MVC, Rails, Django and CakePHP)
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#380Since a few people have asked about Haskell, here are some Haskell benchmarks in comparison: http://www.yesodweb.com/blog/2011/03/preliminary-warp-cross-...
What do you think, bhauer? :)