Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Web Framework Benchmarks

techempower.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 415 posts

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#51

Post by bblackshear »

bhauer wrote: post #13
akmiller wrote: post #10

I'd like to see how .Net MVC would compare. I realize you'd have to spin it up on a Windows EC2 instance and there would definitely be some variance in the performance of that box vs. the nix EC2 instances but I'd still be interested in seeing how it fares in comparison.

We agree. We aim to provide a .NET MVC test soon. We did briefly test that on our i7 hardware and if memory serves me correctly, it clocked in at around the position as Spring. But don't quote me on that! :)

I would also suggest ServiceStack

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#52

Post by pfalls »

atonse wrote: post #28

I'm torn about this. On the one hand, while I've known my framework of choice (Rails) is slow, I didn't know how much slower it could be in the grand scheme of things. But on the other hand, I'm more shocked by the difference between EC2 and dedicated hardware (10x improvement with rails), and even 89 requests per second (20 query benchmark on EC2) is still a decent amount of traffic. (Plus this doesn't count any opt…

EC2 was a hard platform to test on, only because our i7 hardware would give us results fairly instantaneously, but we became impatient when we had to wait upwards of 10x as long for the data on the EC2 large instances.

We're actually very interested in how the large/newer instances perform.

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#53

Post by neya »

How about Lift? Btw, the play framework you tested is Java or Scala based?

Either way, I'm shocked to see Play perform so slow comparatively. Although it's easily 10x faster than rails on most tests, I'm shocked to see Node.js faster than Play! (by 2x in most cases) Wow!!

Maybe Node.js critics should start appreciating it after all..

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#54

Post by hhudolet »

bhauer wrote: post #13
akmiller wrote: post #10

I'd like to see how .Net MVC would compare. I realize you'd have to spin it up on a Windows EC2 instance and there would definitely be some variance in the performance of that box vs. the nix EC2 instances but I'd still be interested in seeing how it fares in comparison.

We agree. We aim to provide a .NET MVC test soon. We did briefly test that on our i7 hardware and if memory serves me correctly, it clocked in at around the position as Spring. But don't quote me on that! :)

I would very much love to see:

(win | mono) + (httphandler | asp.net mvc | webapi | servicestack | nancyfx)

it would hopefully compare with java stacks!

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#55

Post by akg »

Would love to see how these results compare to some of the web frameworks for concurrent functional languages like Erlang/Haskell: Nitrogen, Chicago Boss, Snap, Yesod, etc.

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#57

Post by laumars »

ryanslade wrote: post #40

Why are there no Go results for the DB access benchmarks?

I'd be interested to know this as well. I can understand time constraints in compiling these kind of comparisons, but as I'm about to embark on a web project in Go, I'd be interested to know if there was any technical constraints that prevented benchmarking Go.

Re: Web Framework Benchmarks

#58

Post by obsurvey »

If I wanted to return a bunch of _ids from a mongo database i would do a _id:$in[array of ObjectIDs] and then stream the resulting cursor to res. Streams are core to node. You should use them.
Post reply on HN