Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
21–30 of 66 posts
Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#22Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#23Haha, man would Doug Bowman be pissed.
Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of those just started: http://wrongtomorrow.com/ I should start adding Mike Arrington quotes, he's almost as bad as Scoble.
exactly the idea I had for a site.
Of course, ideas are cheap...
Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
exactly the idea I had for a site.
Hah - I had a similar idea, except it wasn't pundits that you measured, it was regular people. You could make predictions, for the future, and people could vote up the "truthfulness" of them as time went by. You'd need some sort of penalty to discourage people from predicting everything under the sun though. Of course, ideas are cheap...
Only then can you sort out intelligent predictions from noise.
Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#26Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#27Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#28But a broken clock is still right twice a day, so who knows, maybe Arrington's source isn't full of it
Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#29This is the worst thing that could happen to twitter. Google's brand doesn't have quite the same cachè it used to. Today, it means being bought with no improvements to the service for at least a year after that. Look at Grand Central and Jaiku as examples.
I also could imagine some pretty terrible things happening to Twitter... like, for example, the site displaying "FUCK OFF" on every page load, forever.
Re: Sources: Google In Talks To Acquire Twitter
#30Not buying it. This is Google we are talking about, their main move has always been to release their own version of the service, hope to win, and only if that fails, do they open up their pocket book. But a broken clock is still right twice a day, so who knows, maybe Arrington's source isn't full of it
In some cases you might argue that they have bought less known companies, refactored and rebranded the service, and then used it to go after the marked share of a more known service.