Live data from Hacker News

The Purple Crayon

clayallsopp.com

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: The Purple Crayon

#11
That purple crayon sounds ultra cool. I don't remember having read that book, but the OP reminded me of one called Mr Pine's Purple House that made a big impact on me when I was learning to read. Maybe there's a secret purple fraternity of children's books.

Mr Pine lives on a street where all the houses are white with white picket fences, and he can never find his own damn house. (The book didn't say "damn".) One day he decides to bust loose and paint it purple. I remembered this as a crypto-anarchistic 60s radical "do your own thing" kind of thing. It stuck in my mind as a subversive influence.

Years later I discovered that a fan group devoted to this book had formed on the internet and persuaded the now 80-year old author to republish it. I mentioned this randomly one day and months later my son cleverly gave it to me as a birthday present. The whole thing turned out to be far tamer than I remembered! Either it was extremely gentle crypto-anarchism or I totally read that into it. I'm not sure which explanation is better.

Re: The Purple Crayon

#14
I'm guessing Clay is in his 20's? If so, I'm approaching 52 years old and I loved this book equally as much in 1966 or thereabouts. If you're reading this, you made my day by reminding me of it.

> "Coding democratized how we can solve our own problems, regardless of age."

Well said. I'd add that very few old men are innovators, especially when it comes to CS or the like.

What I'm glad to see is more folks in this generation learning how to create their own channels, sell what they make and not depend on larger entities for their survival.

Re: The Purple Crayon

#15
post #10
post #9

It's the story of a boy named Harold and his namesake crayon I don't remember the story by heart but I don't think the crayon was named Harold. But I never obsessed over the story so I could be wrong. Was the crayon named harold?

This seems to be a mistake. I'm pretty sure the namesake mentioned is in reference to the book title, not the boy's name.

Correct, it is an incorrect use of the word namesake. But I'm not sure what the author's intention was when he used it.
Post reply on HN