Live data from Hacker News

PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

github.com

21–30 of 387 posts

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#21

I disagree. Public shaming is the right way to make harassers actually fear the consequences (to their career, for example).

One should not take law into his own hands. If one is harassed, s/he should complain to right authority (police, lawyer, Pycon organizers, etc.). The one who was publicly-shamed can file a defamation suit and you'll be in trouble.

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#22
I applaud the PyCon organizers for clearly delineating what is acceptable behavior and what is not. I especially applaud them for including public shaming in the "unacceptable" category.

The rest of their code is there to protect conference goers. The sections discussing harassment are there for a reason - harassment is a real problem at these events.

Similarly, conference goers should be protected from the threat of being publicized as a less-than-human creature on the Internet. There's been some discussion of the reaction to Adria and Jesse. There could just as likely have been a strong, dangerous reaction to the men who made the comments. Saying "these guys are a threat to women" on the Internet could actually put them in danger, and no one should expect to be put in that situation by attending PyCon.

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#23
post #19
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's some psychotic sociopaths on the internet. There always will be. That doesn't mean "the entire community is dysfunctional." On the contrary, I think the community as a whole has reacted quite rationally.

As long as the community hasn't found a way to root those out, our reaction was worthless, rational or not.

How do you "root" people out who are using random Twitter accounts to post garbage?

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#24

I disagree. Public shaming is the right way to make harassers actually fear the consequences (to their career, for example).

Public shaming shows only one perspective. Furthermore this perspective can potentially be fabricated. Public shaming is akin to vigilante justice, and we as a society decided that was a bad way of "justice" for very good reasons.

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#25
post #19
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's some psychotic sociopaths on the internet. There always will be. That doesn't mean "the entire community is dysfunctional." On the contrary, I think the community as a whole has reacted quite rationally.

As long as the community hasn't found a way to root those out, our reaction was worthless, rational or not.

I think the most vitriolic reactions have been from non-community people.

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#26
After reading all sides of the story, I see why there is so much anger towards Adria. However, it is unacceptable for her or SendGrid to be attacked digitally.

Adria did an arguably right thing in a wrong way at the wrong time.

1. Assuming the way she said it happened is correct, the guys behind her made a sexual (forking/fucking; Dongle/Penis) not sexist joke. If it were even to be seen as sexist, it was towards men.

2. I find it hard to see how taking their pictures and "shaming" them would have made anything thing better. It only set them up to be lynched verbally or otherwise.

3. It was a PRIVATE conversation in a public setting that was overheard. It happens to the best of us. There are 100s of bloopers on YouTube of broadcasters saying embarrassing things when the mic was supposed to be off.

4. She appears hypocritical because at the same PYCON she sexual jokes on Twitter (far much more public) while representing her company (having your company on your profile is almost same as wearing a badge at a conference. Not to include the use of the PYCON hashtag)

5. As a DEVELOPER evangelist for her company, she should be more patient with developers by a massive factor compared to people in other roles. It makes no sense evangelizing for/to people that would be uncomfortable dealing with you. Appeal to understanding, not fear.

6. It is good to know she can stand for herself. Unfortunately, I have to say she got the incident and methodology wrong.

All this will pass, and hopefully serve as a lesson for participants and us observers.

Edited: Spelling of Adria

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#27
One of the reasons I've taken an interest in this whole fiasco is that I occasionally make "colorful" jokes. Not dissimilar from the two guys at PyCon. I make every attempt to keep these jokes private between my friends and I, but I'm sure others have heard me make them. Some people might find them funny, others may be offended. It scares me to think that making an offhand penis joke could result in being publicly outed on Twitter with no opportunity to defend myself.

I believe that Adria Richards did not handle the situation appropriately. I believe she's being a hypocrite by taking offense one day, and making her own penis joke on Twitter the next. I believe that she's further stoking the internet's rage by refusing to admit any fault. I think the other women that are jumping to her defense are doing themselves, and women in technology a disservice. They are not thinking critically or putting themselves in the conference attendee's shoes. I'm quite sure they would not like to be publicly outed for a private conversation.

Public shaming was not the right way to handle the situation. An apology from Adria would have gone a long way in defusing the situation. She chose not to go this route. I'm sad that a silly penis joke turned in to this.

Preemptive Edit: I do NOT believe that ANYONE should suffer the wrath of the Internet. I do NOT believe that ANY conference attendees should have to sit idly by and listen to penis jokes. I'm only saying that publicly shaming these guys was a mistake, and that an apology for the mistake could have basically fixed the problem before it got this far.

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#28
I think the key here is to treat everyone like people. By publicly shaming two individuals and associating them with sexism they are being turned into figureheads for sexism. Real people make mistakes, say stupid things, are affected by their environments and upbringing, have prejudices and biases that they acquired from a life-time of interacting with other people. Everyone is like this, many people do not even realize what some of their biases or prejudices are. Turning them into into figureheads strips away the complexity and says "these guys are what is wrong". Which is complete and utter bullshit. They were just two guys having a private conversation.

If someone says something in private that you disagree with then you should bring it up with them in private or get and intermediary, like the conference organizers to. They may have been very sensitive to gender issues and sympathetic to her agenda but she will never know because she never put the effort into discussing it with them.

Re: PyCon Code of Conduct changed to avoid public shaming

#29

Instead of a learning opportunity, this has turned into an enormous fustercluck. It would have been better for Adria Richards to address the matter directly rather than post a photo on twitter, but it was not wrong for her to address the matter. Similarly, nearly everyone can agree - including Richards - that the employer who allegedly fired one of the people involved in the incident clearly overreacted. There are le…

It got crossposted on various places that have little/nothing to do with programming, so hopefully most of the nasty stuff was just from random dickheads rather than the python community.

Bingo. The meanest reactions have been people with a particular axe to grind rather than Python community members.
Post reply on HN