Earlier quoted context omitted.
One thing to keep in mind, is that author mentions that the same card does not perform equivalently in Windows and Linux, specifically multi-screen support under Linux. From the forum post: "I own a NVidia GTX 690 which I bought for two reasons, gaming, and multi monitor setup for work, NVidia made it very clear that this card would drive up to 3 screens in 2d, which it does quite nicely :-+... under windows :--! The…
I have a GTX680, and it supports three monitors out of the box using the proprietary Nvidia drivers on Linux. No hacks needed.
Resistor hack turns a Nvidia GTX690 into a Quadro K5000 or Tesla K10
191–196 of 196 posts
Re: Resistor hack turns a Nvidia GTX690 into a Quadro K5000 or Tesla K10
#192Re: Resistor hack turns a Nvidia GTX690 into a Quadro K5000 or Tesla K10
#193Re: Resistor hack turns a Nvidia GTX690 into a Quadro K5000 or Tesla K10
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that if I own a piece of hardware, I am the sole owner of every single chip and screw on it, including every hardware hack that it may have. On the other side, usually you don't own the software but only a license that grants you permission to use it.
This is a good point. When you buy hardware, you are now the owner of it so they shouldn't be able to stop you from doing it, just like once you buy a phone you should be able to unlock it or install whatever software you want on it.
Re: Resistor hack turns a Nvidia GTX690 into a Quadro K5000 or Tesla K10
#195The corresponding reddit thread is quite insightful: "It is far cheaper to make one very good chip for the highest market, and modify it slightly for lower end markets... Now, this is the part you hate: this is the only viable alternative. There's no point demanding different designs for different market segments as that would significantly increase the cost you, the consumer, pays. You can demand chips be sold at lo…
It's just a situation where capitalism doesn't lead to the most economically efficient solution. The company and the consumers are rational, yet for no additional cost, everyone could be benefiting from better hardware. Unfortunately I don't have a better system to propose :)
Look at it this way. By decreasing prices in exchange for disabling some features, they increase the total number of consumers. With more consumers the total production costs can be distributed amongst more people. Which lowers prices for everyone, including the people paying for all of the features.
Re: Resistor hack turns a Nvidia GTX690 into a Quadro K5000 or Tesla K10
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't you feel a little stupid for bringing up the term "economically efficient" when you don't know what you're talking about? "Economically efficient" is not equivalent to "the cheapest possible goods"
Could you elaborate in a less rude and more informative manner?