I love this. I just wish it was a joke. This is a daily reality for so many of us.
do you put .java. in your package names? That one stood out as really strange (others were par for the course)
What if you have projects in other jvm languages?
Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
21–30 of 171 posts
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#22This is terrifying. It's like a docu-horror flick for programmers. I actually felt depressed, anxious, frightened, and dispaired going through that code.
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#23lol, cracked me up. I met some c# guy who did the whole enterprise thing in his version, but it wasn't tongue in cheek at all. in my head I went, this is why the whole ms enterprise stack sucks balls. the sad part is that they actually think it's good to abstract away something really simple. EDIT: removed the link, sorry for offending you dude
Your comment offends me, but on a light note, for every 1 developer doing the enterprise overengineering crap, there is a dozen of us C# guys who are doing the opposite where I work.
it shouldn't, it has nothing to do with you, as much as it has something to do with best practice in c#
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#24my colleagues had to come round to my desk to see what it was I was laughing about. Don't remember the last time looking at code made me laugh.
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#25refactored: class F{public static void main(String[]a){for(int i=0;i++ 0?"":"Fizz")+(i%5>0?i%3>0?""+i:"":"Buzz"));}}
That's great, but we're here to make fun of "Enterprise" programming and anything associated with it. Now you come along and give us this simple example that works.
I bet it would still be better in Javascript or Ruby because those are the only two languages that I know and everything is better as a web app anyway.
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment offends me, but on a light note, for every 1 developer doing the enterprise overengineering crap, there is a dozen of us C# guys who are doing the opposite where I work.
it shouldn't, it has nothing to do with you, as much as it has something to do with best practice in c#
Show us the best practice that resembles this FizzBuzz solution.
Also, I'll be waiting to see some code that you think is great.
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#27It's rather cumbersome that you have to initialize all those factories in FizzBuzz.java. You should probably be using an Inversion of Control system.
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
do you put .java. in your package names? That one stood out as really strange (others were par for the course)
What if you have projects in other jvm languages?
never having been in such a situation, I wouldn't know, but this is the first time i'm hearing of people putting java within the package name (for something that's not part of the java namespace)
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#29I love this. I just wish it was a joke. This is a daily reality for so many of us.
do you put .java. in your package names? That one stood out as really strange (others were par for the course)
I haven't actually seen java in package names, but I can easily imagine the conversation where some over-planning architecture astronaut decides that the project may need code in another language in the future (without bothering to worry about if that language even uses Java style packages) and so they better make a directory that is specific for the Java code so they can keep the other code separate, if they need to add more languages in the future.
Re: Fizz Buzz: Enterprise Edition
#30Needs more Internal Frames.