Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

news.cnet.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 51 posts

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#31

Post by hosay123 »

mgkimsal wrote: post #17
hosay123 wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The more interesting question is how many multiples of existing growth will it be before Google start to use the data they collect in incredibly unfriendly ways. How will they push their stock price above $1000? $1200? I'd like to suggest another metric: September 11s (or "9/11s"). How many 9/11s will it be before Google's reuse of the data they collect is popularly legitimized, in their new role as the nation's bigg…

Maybe they could create an RSS reader, and keep track of analytics and behaviour on how people read and consume their favorite sites' content, then insert relevant ads in that experience?

Or perhaps they could create designer glasses, and use the two face recognition companies (Viewdle, Neven Vision) they have bought since 2006 to keep track of population behaviour, then sell relevant feeds to panicked (0.25 9/11s) or eagerly demanding (1.0 9/11s) governments.

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#34

Post by mdwrigh2 »

smtddr wrote: post #28
Snoptic wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is idiotic opposition. Spy cameras exist. Bluetooth earpieces exist, Glass is interesting for what it receives (the server software integration) and for its HUD, not what it caputures and transmits.

The glasses are already getting banned... http://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddisalvo/2013/03/10/the-ban-... I drink gallons of Google-Koolaid, but even I can see(pun intended?) that Google glasses is going to have some social issues. Even I will be a bit uneasy talking to someone wearing them.

They admitted it was a publicity stunt: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyclay/2013/03/10/seattle-bar...

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#36

Post by kayoone »

Theres alot of new tech i am really excited about. Next generation smartphones & tablets, things like Leap Motion/Kinect/MYO, cheap and tiny computers etc.

But Glass isnt really one of them... I cant shake the feeling it will end up in the same strange spot as bluetooth headsets and it just has alot of potential issues with privacy, usability (voice only?) and general appearance.

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#37

Post by ghshephard »

Shenglong wrote: post #3

I used to withhold face-palm reactions to opinions that differed from my own on the premise that all views deserve to be heard, but there is so much ridiculous opposition in the world now, that it's become burdensome. Even reading this trash article was in just about all respects, a horrible waste of time.

I really have no idea, based on your short comment, what your position is on omnipresent surveillance. I, for one, have no problem supporting bars that promise an ass kicking to anyone who shows up wearing google glass - I'm hoping we all quickly agree that, with clear exceptions (repair jobs, field surveys, photo shoots, reporters) - that they won't be an appropriate social use of technology.

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#38

Post by OGinparadise »

What a shame, you are going to miss on all these ads that Google has them lined up for you. Google Glass apps might even sell the fact that your voice is coarse today and convince Johnson & Johnson for $1.50 off a cough medicine. Or use an app analyze your toilet bowl before flushing to see if Kellogg's cereal would benefit your diet. Or suggest some new makeup to your girl friends, maybe it's the lighting but it seems like they could use some new makeup. They'd love that. Who wouldn't, right? You are so hip.

Google Glass was designed by people that make a living by tracking you, your friends and by annoying the hell out of you with advertisements. That is the fundamental problem, it solves their problems, not yours. For almost everyone, there is no need to walk with glasses on, unless the designer of such glasses needs to know every step you take. Need directions? Check the phone and check it again 5 minutes later. No need to look like a glasshole.

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#39

Post by Kiro »

pavs wrote: post #8

I am a gadget geek just like any nerds out there. I like the concept of Google Glass but the practical application scares the shit out of me. Google Glass in its current form is every advertisers/data-miners perfect wet dream. I can see myself smacking someone for taking videos/pictures of me without my consent, by holding a camera right in my face. Google Glass almost legitimizes that kind of behavior. "Oh I can rec…

Eveeyone keeps saying that but how is it a wet dream and why is it bad? Give me a concrete example.

Re: Google Glass: The Opposition Grows

#40

Post by scotty79 »

codezero wrote: post #4

One of the things that hurt the Segway's early adoption was that it was legislated against its intended use as a walking replacement -- they were legislated against (or rather, considered powered vehicles) by many nations and local governments. They are still illegal to drive on sidewalks in the UK. If enough people block the use of Glass, it could have an adverse effect on its sales and growth.

I think the only reason was price. If it costed less than a scooter you'd have kids rolling around the place on these things, and adults eventually too.
Post reply on HN