Google Reader is probably the only place that even has an archive of many defunct blogs. Are they going to archive them somewhere or just throw that trove of web history away?
Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
21–28 of 28 posts
Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#22Google Reader is probably the only place that even has an archive of many defunct blogs. Are they going to archive them somewhere or just throw that trove of web history away?
I'm assuming the Internet Wayback Machine [1] would have them indexed, if they were up for any length of time? [1] http://archive.org/web/web.php
Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#23Apple had Mapgate. Google has Readergate.
Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#24"Reader is (was?) for information junkies; not just tech nerds. This market totally exists and is weirdly under-served (and is possibly affluent)." This is what I don't understand about the death of the RSS ecosystem. A whole class of professionals spend their days reading text -- in government, in finance, in specialist journalism. Many would pay for a decent reader; it's a tool of their trade, after all. You don't…
I have seen companies tried, and worked for a strategic consulting firm at one time who was heavily reliant on RSS feeds for sending information (we were basicly human parsers on very topic-specific items). And they used NewsGator. I get the impression NewGator is not doing that well, and the "I will pay good money" sector you suggest exists does not; very few people are willing to pay for good interface, despite a s…
Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#25Google now more focus on those products which gives more profitability and revenue either direct or through advertising. http://leadsrain.com/
Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#26"Reader is (was?) for information junkies; not just tech nerds. This market totally exists and is weirdly under-served (and is possibly affluent)." This is what I don't understand about the death of the RSS ecosystem. A whole class of professionals spend their days reading text -- in government, in finance, in specialist journalism. Many would pay for a decent reader; it's a tool of their trade, after all. You don't…
Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#27Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects
#28The article hints that it's the recommendation system that is hard and use a lot of resources. Funny as it is exactly the part of the product I didn't care about.
Mostly what I got were suggestions for crap pseudo-blogs from the Gawker content farms.