Live data from Hacker News

Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

gigaom.com

21–28 of 28 posts

Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

#21
post #11

Google Reader is probably the only place that even has an archive of many defunct blogs. Are they going to archive them somewhere or just throw that trove of web history away?

I'm assuming the Internet Wayback Machine [1] would have them indexed, if they were up for any length of time?

[1] http://archive.org/web/web.php

Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

#22
post #11

Google Reader is probably the only place that even has an archive of many defunct blogs. Are they going to archive them somewhere or just throw that trove of web history away?

I'm assuming the Internet Wayback Machine [1] would have them indexed, if they were up for any length of time? [1] http://archive.org/web/web.php

Wayback Machine coverage is pretty spotty, especially for less-popular sites like blogs. I wouldn't depend on it.

Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

#24
post #3

"Reader is (was?) for information junkies; not just tech nerds. This market totally exists and is weirdly under-served (and is possibly affluent)." This is what I don't understand about the death of the RSS ecosystem. A whole class of professionals spend their days reading text -- in government, in finance, in specialist journalism. Many would pay for a decent reader; it's a tool of their trade, after all. You don't…

I have seen companies tried, and worked for a strategic consulting firm at one time who was heavily reliant on RSS feeds for sending information (we were basicly human parsers on very topic-specific items). And they used NewsGator. I get the impression NewGator is not doing that well, and the "I will pay good money" sector you suggest exists does not; very few people are willing to pay for good interface, despite a s…

People were not willing to switch or to pay because Google Reader offered a very decent alternative for free. Now that this is changing, the landscape may shift. Will be interesting to see what happens.

Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

#26

"Reader is (was?) for information junkies; not just tech nerds. This market totally exists and is weirdly under-served (and is possibly affluent)." This is what I don't understand about the death of the RSS ecosystem. A whole class of professionals spend their days reading text -- in government, in finance, in specialist journalism. Many would pay for a decent reader; it's a tool of their trade, after all. You don't…

Why don't they just use local apps? Why does this have to be a web service in the first place?

Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

#27
post #23
post #16

Apple had Mapgate. Google has Readergate.

This is a great example of trials faced by both companies if you have suffered a head injury and can only remember the lady six months.

thanks, autocorrect- of course I meant "last"

Re: Google Reader lived on borrowed time: creator Chris Wetherell reflects

#28

The article hints that it's the recommendation system that is hard and use a lot of resources. Funny as it is exactly the part of the product I didn't care about.

Right. I don't recall ever subscribing to one of its recommendations.

Mostly what I got were suggestions for crap pseudo-blogs from the Gawker content farms.

Post reply on HN