Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
11–20 of 31 posts
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#12Hacker News is a user curated news site, not a forum.
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#13Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#14Now, sometimes I will check the comments before upvoting. But not always.
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#15Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#16But a fix might be that an item can only be marked interesting on the item page, not on the overview pages.
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#17On the other hand, let's consider scenarios where your concern might be totally valid -- say, if the same article was simply link-bait to a spammer's penny stock advertisement. In that case the article might pop fast to the top of HN, but likely just as quickly flagged and removed. So, flagging of articles that are crass advertising, flaming link-bait or just plain inappropriate for HN is the remedy there.
The question is -- is there a case where a story is appropriate for HN and not likely to get flagged, but also is not nearly as worthy or compelling as the title suggests?
I'm having a hard time coming up with that scenario, but in true HN-form I'm willing to be corrected. While I disagree with your statement that "It would be a very interesting result IF it were confirmed to be true," (and that seems to be the emerging consensus), I pose the question back to you and HNers -- what would be the scenario where reading the comments prior to upvoting would help improve the quality of story on HN page one, where flagging is also not the appropriate remedy?
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#18I disagree. It was still an interesting story and the resulting discussion was both interesting and educational. Suppressing that kind of discussion would make HN a less valuable place, not more valuable.
Crazy claims tend to produce some really interesting stuff.
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#19The top story on HN as of this comment is a Slate article debunking the bacteria claim, validating not only the newsworthiness of the original story, but also highlighting the full-arc drama HNers got to follow by seeing both stories featured prominently on the front page. On the other hand , let's consider scenarios where your concern might be totally valid -- say, if the same article was simply link-bait to a spamm…
Re: Ask HN: Please don't upvote stories before reading the comments
#20In some cases, a wrong story is still worth the read, even if just for the comments on HN. Btw., your link gives HTTP 404.