Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
arstechnica.com
Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#2Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#3http://www.matasano.com/log/644/safety-vs-security-2/
OS X is a suburb. Win32 is downtown Manhattan. You might prefer the suburbs, but remember: neighborhoods change.
Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#4Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#5My partner Dave made this point in 2006; it's one of our more popular posts, and got good comments: http://www.matasano.com/log/644/safety-vs-security-2/ OS X is a suburb. Win32 is downtown Manhattan. You might prefer the suburbs, but remember: neighborhoods change.
Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#6My partner Dave made this point in 2006; it's one of our more popular posts, and got good comments: http://www.matasano.com/log/644/safety-vs-security-2/ OS X is a suburb. Win32 is downtown Manhattan. You might prefer the suburbs, but remember: neighborhoods change.
[deleted]
Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
[deleted]
What part of the Mac is analogous to the shiny security system? It's Win32 that has all the sensors and alarm circuits these days.
Googling just now corrected me, so I deleted my comment as it was inaccurate and a poor analogy. Sorry about that.
Re: Pwn2Own winner says Macs are more safe, though less secure
#8(PS: I am an Opera user, but not a fanatic/fanboy etc. I am not trying to start a browser flame here.)