Live data from Hacker News

Heroku Class Action

herokuclassaction.com

11–20 of 78 posts

Re: Heroku Class Action

#11

General question: do class action lawsuits need to be sponsored/initiated by an actual plaintiff, or can lawyers just start a bunch of class actions hoping one will eventually stick and they'll get some fees out of them? Edit: s/defendant/plaintiff/

They probably haven't filed anything, if they get a couple bites then they will.

Re: Heroku Class Action

#12
Wow, seriously? This is way over the top and unnecessarily snide ("Heroku...supposedly assists web application developers"). Stop Heroku? Pretty sure nobody's gonna get on board with that.

What is it even trying to accomplish? As far as I can tell it's essentially an ad for that law firm.

Re: Heroku Class Action

#13
Dear Heroku, slice off a piece of your offering that shows some love to the Ruby community again. Lets call it the Maple stack. Have this stack use the old routing infrastructure.

Edit: To be clear, I do not support this legal action. I do want Heroku to hear the community, but I don't want it to go this far.

Re: Heroku Class Action

#14

General question: do class action lawsuits need to be sponsored/initiated by an actual plaintiff, or can lawyers just start a bunch of class actions hoping one will eventually stick and they'll get some fees out of them? Edit: s/defendant/plaintiff/

[deleted]

Re: Heroku Class Action

#15

oh look, a parasitic lawyer-company trying to suck some money out of a technology company. it must be a day that ends in -y.

You honestly don't believe that, if the allegations are true, Heroku has done something wrong?

Re: Heroku Class Action

#17

Wow, seriously? This is way over the top and unnecessarily snide ("Heroku...supposedly assists web application developers"). Stop Heroku? Pretty sure nobody's gonna get on board with that. What is it even trying to accomplish? As far as I can tell it's essentially an ad for that law firm.

While I agree this does seem to just be a law firm trying to make some money, Heroku did directly lie to developers about Cedar stack's routing being "intelligent" when it is indeed random.

New Relic's plugin was pretty quickly updated to include the missing time after the rapgenius article came out. But that doesn't excuse Heroku from lying about what they were selling and so far they've done nothing to make amends for those lies.

Re: Heroku Class Action

#19
post #17

Wow, seriously? This is way over the top and unnecessarily snide ("Heroku...supposedly assists web application developers"). Stop Heroku? Pretty sure nobody's gonna get on board with that. What is it even trying to accomplish? As far as I can tell it's essentially an ad for that law firm.

While I agree this does seem to just be a law firm trying to make some money, Heroku did directly lie to developers about Cedar stack's routing being "intelligent" when it is indeed random. New Relic's plugin was pretty quickly updated to include the missing time after the rapgenius article came out. But that doesn't excuse Heroku from lying about what they were selling and so far they've done nothing to make amends…

The misleading documentation that started all the controversy was about Heroku's legacy Bamboo stack, not the new Cedar stack.

The Cedar stack (which Heroku has been encouraging people to use for a long while now) has always claimed to do random routing.

Re: Heroku Class Action

#20

Dear Heroku, slice off a piece of your offering that shows some love to the Ruby community again. Lets call it the Maple stack. Have this stack use the old routing infrastructure. Edit: To be clear, I do not support this legal action. I do want Heroku to hear the community, but I don't want it to go this far.

There is no 'old' routing infrastructure. It has never changed on each stack (but that's not to say they are the same. I don't know about that)
Post reply on HN