Live data from Hacker News

Flat UI, mirrored

github.com

21–30 of 103 posts

Re: Flat UI, mirrored

#22
Why not just respond to the initial dcma rather than playing a game of cat and mouse. No one is going to use it while it has dubious copyright status anyway.

Re: Flat UI, mirrored

#23

Why not just respond to the initial dcma rather than playing a game of cat and mouse. No one is going to use it while it has dubious copyright status anyway.

They did. https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2013-03-06-LayerV...

Mirroring it while Github drags their feet reenabling seems fair enough.

Re: Flat UI, mirrored

#26
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your assuming someone nicked your stuff. With millions of sites out there are a lot of layouts, icons, and whatnot that look similar that are not in fact copy's. Worse designers are rarely the type of people that think of the (millions) ^ 2 possibilities. Honestly, unless your talking about a large file with a lot of entropy your probably in the wrong sending a DMCA take-down request.

>Your assuming someone nicked your stuff you're >Honestly, unless your talking about a large file with a lot of entropy your probably you're, you're

mate and that's actually DOES NOT changes his point =) grammar Nazies should stop reading hacker news

Re: Flat UI, mirrored

#27

Why not just respond to the initial dcma rather than playing a game of cat and mouse. No one is going to use it while it has dubious copyright status anyway.

They did. https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2013-03-06-LayerV... Mirroring it while Github drags their feet reenabling seems fair enough.

That's not fair to Github, IMO; service providers have next to no discretion in DMCA issues.

Re: Flat UI, mirrored

#30
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your assuming someone nicked your stuff. With millions of sites out there are a lot of layouts, icons, and whatnot that look similar that are not in fact copy's. Worse designers are rarely the type of people that think of the (millions) ^ 2 possibilities. Honestly, unless your talking about a large file with a lot of entropy your probably in the wrong sending a DMCA take-down request.

>Your assuming someone nicked your stuff you're >Honestly, unless your talking about a large file with a lot of entropy your probably you're, you're

> that are not in fact copy's.

And you missed the inverse.. Pedantry is non constructive.

Post reply on HN