Live data from Hacker News

New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

nytimes.com

11–20 of 120 posts

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#11
I think the relevant players (I mean, not the UN and their 'strong-worded letters') have decided it's time to call the bluff

Doing a Nuclear test is one thing, mounting it on a rocket and sending it far away is another.

I think they decided to stop this before it gets ugly.

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#12
post #4

And nobody cares because there is no oil or other goods to harvest in North Korea.

If they had those resources, they would just have stronger ties with China. They have long had the ability to rain destruction down on Seoul, South Korea (a heavily populated city with strong ties in the West, and increasingly ties with China, AFAIK) in the event of aggression against them. None of the Middle East countries have such a situation (that I know of).

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#13
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The unfortunate reality is that a "threat" of war, or even a war itself, is what it might take for real changes to take place in the country. That sucks for the people in the short run, but might change the game for their future.

Threatening a nuclear strike is pretty serious stuff - I hope the North Koreans are sensible enough not to fuel up any rockets in the near future... I also wonder if there is a back channel somewhere where they tell the Chinese, who would then presumably tell the US, that they really are just posturing and there is no real threat.

The nuclear strike isn't an immediate threat. They don't have the means to put the weapon where it actually hurts.

The more serious threat is the artillery pointed at Soeul...

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#14

I've been wondering all day how this will end, and especially if anything will happen on/before the 11th of March when North Korea will apparently cancel cease-fire if the South don't stop doing drills.

It's just another layer of threat. Nothing substantial will happen in NK, they know the can only lose. My best guess is that it's all propaganda aimed at the people in NK to secure the future of the elite.

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#15
post #7

Wow. More juvenile posturing, or the beginning of the end for North Korea? Depends on whether anyone takes them seriously. And with a growing nuclear capability, they can't be taken not-seriously. This is suicide for them.

I agree. What I don't understand is why they are doing this. They have nothing to gain, and everything to lose.

If North Korea ever decides to uses their nuclear weapons, South Korea will be just as badly off. Actual use of nuclear weapons is a lose-lose scenario for all parties involved (and, indeed, all parties not involved). Threatening use of nuclear weapons is another matter altogether.

It is probably also worth noting that every single western nuclear power reserves the right to first use of nuclear weapons. In fact, the only countries who have ever adopted a no first use policy are the USSR/Russia (for 2 decades, but not any more), India (this is apparently more ambiguous now) and China (who continue to hold to it).

Wikipedia briefly mentions a North Korean pledge to the same effect, but I think this latest news shows that we should probably not take that too seriously.

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#16
post #7

Wow. More juvenile posturing, or the beginning of the end for North Korea? Depends on whether anyone takes them seriously. And with a growing nuclear capability, they can't be taken not-seriously. This is suicide for them.

I agree. What I don't understand is why they are doing this. They have nothing to gain, and everything to lose.

A rational North Korean state would not engage in nuclear war in just about any scenario as it would mean almost certain destruction for itself in response. To help persuade their enemies not to invade they try to appear as irrational as possible.

There's an interesting segment in this psychology lecture about irrationality that seems related:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5IrSEIPdwk#t=44m36s

    There is some advantage to being irrational, to having a temper.
    Because if you have a temper and you're known to be irrational, people
    are forced, by dint of your irrationality, to treat you better. Who am
    I going to take from? The person who's extremely reasonable or the
    person who has a hair-trigger temper? Well, I'm going to pick on a
    reasonable person because the unreasonable person might do unreasonable
    things. And this is faintly paradoxical, but often to be irrational, or
    at least to have a reputation for mild irrationality, gives you an
    edge.

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#18
post #14

I've been wondering all day how this will end, and especially if anything will happen on/before the 11th of March when North Korea will apparently cancel cease-fire if the South don't stop doing drills.

It's just another layer of threat. Nothing substantial will happen in NK, they know the can only lose. My best guess is that it's all propaganda aimed at the people in NK to secure the future of the elite.

Well, they do have a huge army( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Peoples_Army ), things could get quite messy. They might not do anything, except threaten others. But sometimes others react to threats...

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#19

I think the relevant players (I mean, not the UN and their 'strong-worded letters') have decided it's time to call the bluff Doing a Nuclear test is one thing, mounting it on a rocket and sending it far away is another. I think they decided to stop this before it gets ugly.

Off-topic: http://xkcd.com/859/ :)

Re: New Sanctions Imposed on North Korea as it Warns of Pre-emptive Nuclear Attack

#20
I used to live next door to a rather cool and beautiful Japanese woman, and the only time I ever saw her rattled was when N Korea first tested in 2006. She was genuinely scared her country would be attacked the next day.

North Korea should scare everyone. NK's only ally, China, has clearly stood alongside everyone else in the fricking world and proposed sanctions. That is like USA cutting off Isreal's aid - its huge.

(Although they may have given them the damn bombs in the first place)

No one is going to lob nuclear bombs back, but right now, any freighter leaving Pyongyang is going to be searched very very throughly. And I would move out of Seoul for a few days.

Post reply on HN