Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another good reason why you should always use "example.com".
I'm surprised http://example.com is reserved by IANA.
Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
41–50 of 131 posts
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#42Looks like it's a cut/paste error. If you do wget www.doioig.gov, this is the page you get. Notice the meta refresh that points to stackoverflow.com. window.location.href = "http://www.doi.gov/oig/index.cfm" Page Redirection If you are not redirected automatically, please click the link to continue to the U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General.
And here's why: http://stackoverflow.com/a/5411601/620239 . Forgot to change that first occurrence after pasting it in. "Oh, it works. I'm done."
Here are the past revisions: http://stackoverflow.com/posts/5411601/revisions
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#43https://www.google.com/search?q=stackoverflow&aq=0&oq=stackover&aqs=chrome.0.0j5j57j0j62.3537&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=stack+overflow&oq=stack+overflow&gs_l=serp.3..0l4.4882.4882.0.5337.1.1.0.0.0.0.135.135.0j1.1.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.5.psy-ab.gWmJt4vWzvg&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.43148975,d.dmQ&fp=c1794afd088c3d78&biw=1440&bih=795 isn't that too long just for https:/…
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#44Looks like it's a cut/paste error. If you do wget www.doioig.gov, this is the page you get. Notice the meta refresh that points to stackoverflow.com. window.location.href = "http://www.doi.gov/oig/index.cfm" Page Redirection If you are not redirected automatically, please click the link to continue to the U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General.
Why would this rank them so high though? Does the googlebot actually follow the http-equiv="refresh". If so, would changing http://stackoverflow.com to say http://dell.com make them rank #1 for searching for dell as well?
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. And DuckDuckGo. And Google. Why give all your searches to one search engine and one company? Depending on what you're searching for, Google doesn't always provide the best results.
How do you allocate your searches? Does the better quality of results justify the inconvenience of using several engines or is there a mechanism I'm unaware of?
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#46https://www.google.com/search?q=stackoverflow&aq=0&oq=stackover&aqs=chrome.0.0j5j57j0j62.3537&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=stack+overflow&oq=stack+overflow&gs_l=serp.3..0l4.4882.4882.0.5337.1.1.0.0.0.0.135.135.0j1.1.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.5.psy-ab.gWmJt4vWzvg&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.43148975,d.dmQ&fp=c1794afd088c3d78&biw=1440&bih=795 isn't that too long just for https:/…
How about this? http://googl.com/#q=stack+overflow Source: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-shortest-google...
If it's a short URL you want, then http://bit.ly/YUJZLu. But you'll have to trust me when you click that as you've no idea where it'll take you to.
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#47Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about this? http://googl.com/#q=stack+overflow Source: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-shortest-google...
That link sadly does not work for me who uses iGoogle (for now) on google.co.uk. If it's a short URL you want, then http://bit.ly/YUJZLu . But you'll have to trust me when you click that as you've no idea where it'll take you to.
Re: Stack Overflow ranks #2 for Google Search for "Stack Overflow"
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
And here's why: http://stackoverflow.com/a/5411601/620239 . Forgot to change that first occurrence after pasting it in. "Oh, it works. I'm done."
That's brilliant, surprised that Google managed to rank them so highly because of it though!