Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's true for vi, but VIM has a mode indicator on a status bar since times immemorial. That's a nice improvement -- an indicator to tell you which of the three exclusive modes you're in at the moment. But imagine this -- imagine eliminating both the indicator, and the modes, all in one fell swoop, as modern editors have done. > ... please take a closer look at modern VIM and then come back with a critique that make…
"imagine eliminating both the indicator, and the modes" I was using modeless editors all my life; I was working with Zend Studio and Komodo IDE which are definitely modern editors. Yet I chose to have modes and switched to VIM. In other words I have no problem with imagining editors you talk about, I just don't like them. "When I wrote Apple Writer in 1978 ..." That's a funny thing, because VIM appeared in 1993 and o…
I identified my subject very clearly. Are you really unaware that vim derives from vi, and contains the same core code and strategy? That a discussion of vim is a discussion of vi? But let's allow Google to decide this for us:
Search for "vi/vim" : "About 482,000 results" ... Q.E.D.
> On the other hand, please stop bashing modes ...
You won't get far with this as an argument. All modern editors bash modes by not having them (the sincerest form of unflattery). Not one editor written since 1980 has used modes (except vim, of course), because they're an idea whose purpose has vanished.
> and stop including VIM in your rants.
Vim is vi brought back to life -- old wine in a new bottle.