Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why are you surprised? It's a free service. I assume that my data is for sale for every free service I use. Also, the parent is Intuit which, IMO, is not exactly tops when it comes to data security and privacy.
Because the point number 1 on their Privacy and Security Policy is "Your Privacy is not for sale" : https://www.mint.com/how-it-works/security/policy/ The way it is worded, it seems like your e-mail may be used by Intuit for promotion or by third-parties bound by the same privacy policies, but certainly not sold for spam.
Why was my email leaked?
81–90 of 265 posts
Re: Why was my email leaked?
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those mods don't work for Dropbox, they are community volunteers who've just been given mod permissions.
That doesn't matter in the slightest. This is the company's OFFICIAL forum, and therefore the conduct of the appointed "moderators" reflects that of the company.
Re: Why was my email leaked?
#83Re: Why was my email leaked?
#84The way the moderators handled this was pretty damn bad. Two different users tell the moderator they use UNIQUE e-mail addresses for dropbox only, and they received spam roughly at the same time and yet the moderator answers by assuming the users are idiots.
The way some people do "fredsmith+amazon@gmail.com" as proof that it must be amazon that leaks their passwords has some issues. The guy who says that he had a truly random bunch of letters as his dropbox account is probably a better indicator, but it's hard to know if the guy ever leaked it himself. Doesn't excuse the moderators being jerks, though.
Re: Why was my email leaked?
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those mods don't work for Dropbox, they are community volunteers who've just been given mod permissions.
That doesn't matter in the slightest. This is the company's OFFICIAL forum, and therefore the conduct of the appointed "moderators" reflects that of the company.
Re: Why was my email leaked?
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why are you surprised? It's a free service. I assume that my data is for sale for every free service I use. Also, the parent is Intuit which, IMO, is not exactly tops when it comes to data security and privacy.
Because the point number 1 on their Privacy and Security Policy is "Your Privacy is not for sale" : https://www.mint.com/how-it-works/security/policy/ The way it is worded, it seems like your e-mail may be used by Intuit for promotion or by third-parties bound by the same privacy policies, but certainly not sold for spam.
Same difference in my book. If you are not the original entity that I supplied my address to, and I get email from some 3rd party, that's SPAM. Sure, you could argue that it's in the T&C and that I "agreed" to it, but it's still SPAM the way I see it. And since it's a 3rd party, then that'd mean my information was sold (or otherwise bartered/traded).
Re: Why was my email leaked?
#87Re: Why was my email leaked?
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Speaking of which, this alias system from google is great in theory, but kind of pointless in practice; spammers can easily figure out they can just remove everything from the + sign, including the sign itself, and boom, they have my address without the specific alias.
It's pointless in practice in theory; in practice in practice spammers (in my experience) don't target + aliases. And if you think about the set of people who are likely to give money to spammers, the set of people using + aliases, and the fraction of + alias space that is occupied versus the fraction of non-+'aliased space that is occupied, the reason why becomes clear.
Re: Why was my email leaked?
#89Re: Why was my email leaked?
#90Unfortunately I have seen their customer service go downhill recently. Not sure if they are having capacity problems or something. 2 weeks ago I signed up for a trial of Dropbox Teams and it said that after the trial I would be dropped back to my Pro account. I cancelled the trial as had made my mind up not to do it and it dropped me to a free account. Several emails to support, the account manager I'd been provided…