Live data from Hacker News

The Chromebook Pixel

chrome.blogspot.com

251–260 of 507 posts

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#251
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Considering that this is actually competing against the Retina MacBook Pro, it's actually $200 cheaper...

The importance of price anchoring... $100 more? Is it better than a MacBook? $200 less? Wow...MacBooks are so overpriced.

$200 less than a macbook retina 13" with 2560x1600. Up until now there have been no competitors even near this resolution.

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#253
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you develop on this? I'm used to using Linux, command line, text editors, local installs of the product I'm developing for, virtual machines, etc... Are you simply forced into using ALL websites to actually develop and unable to use anything else? Seems strange to pay $1250+ to develop on a machine that cannot even run or test the code you write.

Action.IO... Cloud9... Koding...

What about them ?

I honestly don't think of them as IDEs more as text editors with syntax highlighting.

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#255

There are only three meaningful things you can do with a computer with specs like this: development, design, or gaming. And yet ChromeOS can't do any of these things. Perhaps this is a vanity product for the wealthy. But wealthy people are going to just surf the web on an iPad. I really don't get this product.

[deleted]

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#256
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chrome has a wonderful SSH client [0], and with a $5/mo Digital Ocean [1] (or other [2]) VPS for all your UNIX work, it's a perfectly capable dev machine. [0]: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/secure-shell/pnhec... [1]: https://www.digitalocean.com/ [2]: http://www.lowendbox.com/

2560 x 1700 display is a big deal for devs, but I think I'd find the extra $200 and get a Macbook pro.

On a 13" display, those specs are a gimmick, MAYBE useful for examining professional photos.

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chrome has a wonderful SSH client [0], and with a $5/mo Digital Ocean [1] (or other [2]) VPS for all your UNIX work, it's a perfectly capable dev machine. [0]: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/secure-shell/pnhec... [1]: https://www.digitalocean.com/ [2]: http://www.lowendbox.com/

I got a cr-48 in november 2010. The new chromeOS remaps ctrl-o to "open window" even when in crosh, so you can't save files in nano or pico. I stopped using it altogether. It's gathering dust.

I'll give you $50 for it!

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#258
post #239
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I really don't get this product. Many people are not rational when they buy products. All you can do with a pair of jeans is wear them. Nice denim, nice rivets, nice pockets, and a nice zip (or buttons) - and then some quality control. And yet people can pay very much money for jeans. (Sort by price, high to low. ( http://www.mrporter.com/Shop/Clothing/Jeans?sortBy=price-des... ) You say that wealthy people are jus…

If buying a product makes the buyer happy, you can hardly call the purchase "irrational."

A product making a buyer happy is not a condition for whether a purchase is rational or not. If you have a family, then suddenly you decide to buy a ticket to Amsterdam and burn your kids college money on hookers and blow, being 'happy' doesn't suddenly make all of that rational.

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#259
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People who "live in the cloud" with a 16GB iPad have very un-demanding needs. They're people like my mom, who take some photos and send some e-mails. They're not going to buy a $1,300 machine to do those things when a $500 iPad does them just fine.

That's the problem with speaking for the general population, you say "most people need more", someone else says "most people only need X" and the conversation goes no where.

The FACTS speak for themselves. Look at the sales and Apple's advertising.

Re: The Chromebook Pixel

#260
post #116
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For a much slower CPU and 1/4 the disk, and an OS that has no apps.

I would consider in this calculation that the chromebook comes with 1 terabyte free storage on the cloud for 3 years.

Who uses 1TB of storage?
Post reply on HN