Live data from Hacker News

Google Glass

google.com

61–70 of 591 posts

Re: Google Glass

#61
post #14

I didn't realise how bad it looks. The premise looks awesome. The demo video... awesome. The way the product looks on someone's face... this isn't the finished product right? I think Google should look at designer glasses and outsource the design to someone who knows what they are doing.

Version 1.0 is always going to look bulky and weird. After a few iterations, they should look a lot cooler.

Re: Google Glass

#62

Those are the use cases ? Are they serious ? Not a single one of those occurs routinely enough to warrant you wearing glasses all the time. I don't understand why they aren't positioning this for more serious markets e.g. education, training, factories, stock taking, hospitals, administration etc. Could have been far more interesting and allowed some far more interesting tie ins with their existing products.

I think the marketing push is to make it socially acceptable. Their utility in the workplace is obvious.

Re: Google Glass

#63
post #52

Isn't the HUD a bit... distracting? I mean, I was looking the video and if I focused in the HUD I couldn't watch the "real life" and vice-versa, how would that work in the real Glass? Also, it seems like for now it's only focused in social features... I should get some friends before getting the Glass.

Augmented reality would be nice. Put the clock on the wall instead of in front of the world.

Re: Google Glass

#64
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The initial reaction to portable headphones was probably similar. "It celebrated its debut in July 1979 for about $200. Truthfully, many were skeptical if this portable audio thing would take off. " https://blog.sony.com/2010/08/flashback-friday-tps-l2-walkma... http://coolmaterial.com/roundup/history-of-headphones/

> The initial reaction to portable headphones was probably similar. To be honest headphones are still seen as an utilitarian thing only.

> To be honest I still see headphones as an utilitarian thing only.

FTFY. There are a _lot_ of people who would disagree with you (which is why Beats/Skullcandy/etc headphones are so popular).

Re: Google Glass

#65
post #52

Isn't the HUD a bit... distracting? I mean, I was looking the video and if I focused in the HUD I couldn't watch the "real life" and vice-versa, how would that work in the real Glass? Also, it seems like for now it's only focused in social features... I should get some friends before getting the Glass.

I played World of Warcraft for a bit, and there was a HUD overlay onto the screen. After a while, you kind of get used to it. Also, the devs could make it so that you could control the opacity of the HUD, the position/size, or turn it on/off based on gestures.

Re: Google Glass

#66
Ok. So 100% voice-based. That makes sense. That's great. Except if you don't speak English as your primary language.

I've tried Google's voice-recognition on my native language and the results have been closer to sad than lulz-worthy.

Yes, I know English. Yes, I can both write and speak it fairly well. That's not the point: You won't believe how awkward a context-switch from "I'm talking to people" to "I'm talking to this machine, but I need to do so in English" actually feels.

It's just feels so fundamentally wrong, that despite how it might save you time and effort you always go for the option where voice-recognition is not involved.

Unless Google improves their voice-recognition for everything not US English, I predict this product failing horribly in most markets, even with everything else 100% perfect and flawlessly executed.

Re: Google Glass

#67
This Google Glass requires internet connection right? I like to know how effective it will be to those country with a limited or not so good data connection. Here in us, LTE is just starting, and mobile data service is not really that good. It's good to have this kind of gadgets, but I hope technologies in some non first world country can catch up. I really love to own one immediately, but I think, location wise, it's not a good idea yet.

Re: Google Glass

#68
post #16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're paying $1500 to beta test a product You say that as if this is a USB dongle. This is sci-fi stuff. Who cares if it's beta?

No to throw cold water here but Is it really? It seems to be rather trivial integration of currently known and available technologies with bit of miniaturization efforts. Nothing that 5 year old iPhone can't do with albeit more convenience. Space elevators, 100% artificial life form, fusion reactor of the size AA batteries - now that, my friend, would be sci-fi stuff.

This feels a lot like one of those comments people will link to in 5 years and give a wry chuckle.

"No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

Re: Google Glass

#69

Ok. So 100% voice-based. That makes sense. That's great. Except if you don't speak English as your primary language. I've tried Google's voice-recognition on my native language and the results have been closer to sad than lulz-worthy. Yes, I know English. Yes, I can both write and speak it fairly well. That's not the point: You won't believe how awkward a context-switch from "I'm talking to people" to "I'm talking to…

I would always choose the non-voice option if possible, even in english, but can anyone think of a useful way this could work without it?

Re: Google Glass

#70
post #43
post #14

I didn't realise how bad it looks. The premise looks awesome. The demo video... awesome. The way the product looks on someone's face... this isn't the finished product right? I think Google should look at designer glasses and outsource the design to someone who knows what they are doing.

http://econogirl.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/braces.jpg The metal line is reminiscent of a head brace, while the projector makes you look like cyborg escaped from a Halloween party. They will need a stunning amount of marketing and advertising for this to become socially acceptable. I guess it could be a little bit worse, I can see they were trying to go for sleek... I think the greater problem was that the actual us…

"They will need a stunning amount of marketing and advertising for this to become socially acceptable."

Come on, people with these things http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/electronics/detai... on their ear look cool, busy and important ;)

Post reply on HN