You're paying $1500 to beta test a product. What's not clear is whether you get the final product when ready.
Google Glass
11–20 of 591 posts
Re: Google Glass
#12You're paying $1500 to beta test a product. What's not clear is whether you get the final product when ready.
Re: Google Glass
#13Re: Google Glass
#14I think Google should look at designer glasses and outsource the design to someone who knows what they are doing.
Re: Google Glass
#15I didn't realise how bad it looks. The premise looks awesome. The demo video... awesome. The way the product looks on someone's face... this isn't the finished product right? I think Google should look at designer glasses and outsource the design to someone who knows what they are doing.
Re: Google Glass
#16You're paying $1500 to beta test a product. What's not clear is whether you get the final product when ready.
You're paying $1500 to beta test a product You say that as if this is a USB dongle. This is sci-fi stuff. Who cares if it's beta?
Re: Google Glass
#17Re: Google Glass
#18Note that the glasses look ugly, but they are already developing lenses with screens in it. This is basically technology becoming one with your brain.
I want one bad!
Re: Google Glass
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're paying $1500 to beta test a product You say that as if this is a USB dongle. This is sci-fi stuff. Who cares if it's beta?
No to throw cold water here but Is it really? It seems to be rather trivial integration of currently known and available technologies with bit of miniaturization efforts. Nothing that 5 year old iPhone can't do with albeit more convenience. Space elevators, 100% artificial life form, fusion reactor of the size AA batteries - now that, my friend, would be sci-fi stuff.
WHAT ARE YOU NOT GETTING HERE?