Live data from Hacker News

Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

mauriciogardini.com

41–50 of 74 posts

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#41
I have used Slate for quite a while to manage my windows, and I think it's great, especially the snapshoting and layout functionality allowing me to go easily between an external screen and my laptop's screen.

One of the later versions added support for Javascript configuration which makes it extremely powerful: https://github.com/jigish/slate/wiki/JavaScript-Configs

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#42
post #32

Slate is amazing, been using it for a few months. Biggest issue is it takes a bit of config to get it just right. Here's my config file. # Configs config defaultToCurrentScreen true config checkDefaultsOnLoad true config windowHintsShowIcons true config windowHintsIgnoreHiddenWindows false #config windowHintsDuration 5 config windowHintsSpread true #config windowHintsOrder persist config windowHintsFontColor 0;0;0;1.…

Prepend four spaces to get a formatting-preserving view. Though you might want to plop that on a pastebin somewhere instead.

Actually, you only need to prepend two spaces. :)

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of people -- I'm one of them -- find that switching whole windows seems to pop the mental stack. Whereas turning my head left and right does not do so. Most programming requires at least 4 logical views, IMO: 1. The code 2. The result of the code (web page, test results etc) 3. Documentation that supports coding 4. A control mechanism (ie, a terminal) No doubt there will be quibbling that some of these are reall…

Lots of people -- I'm one of them -- find that switching whole windows seems to pop the mental stack. That's really interesting! I have the opposite problem - switching windows doesn't pop my mental stack, but if there's anything on the screen other than what I'm trying to focus on, it keeps diverting my attention and ruining my concentration. Fullscreen emacs on OSX (without even the system menu bar!) is just awesom…

How do you get true fullscreen mode in Emacs on OS X?

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of people -- I'm one of them -- find that switching whole windows seems to pop the mental stack. That's really interesting! I have the opposite problem - switching windows doesn't pop my mental stack, but if there's anything on the screen other than what I'm trying to focus on, it keeps diverting my attention and ruining my concentration. Fullscreen emacs on OSX (without even the system menu bar!) is just awesom…

How do you get true fullscreen mode in Emacs on OS X?

With Emacs 24 you can use ns-toggle-fullscreen.

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#45
post #41

I have used Slate for quite a while to manage my windows, and I think it's great, especially the snapshoting and layout functionality allowing me to go easily between an external screen and my laptop's screen. One of the later versions added support for Javascript configuration which makes it extremely powerful: https://github.com/jigish/slate/wiki/JavaScript-Configs

What made me go 'ooh!' was the single-to-multi-monitor layout support over anything else, I've looked a few times for something to do that but never came across Slate.

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#46
post #19

Since it seems that everyone is posting their favorite flavor, here's mine: http://spectacleapp.com/ . Open source and gets you hooked in minutes. I can't imagine using OS X without it.

+1. I've been using spectacle with great success. I previously tied the demo for Sizeup, which is a little more polished, but cost $20 at the time. The only thing that Spectacle is missing is the ability to move windows between monitors. I recently switched to a single 27", so I haven't been missing this feature. I'm definitely going to check out Slate — looks cool.

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#47
post #39

I do find tiling wm without removing the window borders kind of ... well not really useless, but not all that practival. Especially on OS X, where the hot keys are pretty well standardized and you can be pretty sure about what Command-Q does, spending all that room on window borders and few buttons seems so wasteful.

I completely agree with you. But once I found this interest setup where you'd map the caps lock key to ctrl/esc and then the ctrl key to cmd+alt+shift+ctrl. That mapping can act like another modifier key. Aside from some games, I have yet to find a program that gets in the way of my setup.

http://stevelosh.com/blog/2012/10/a-modern-space-cadet/

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#48
I always found that 50-50 screen split impractical. Many websites want more screen estate. Some apps are sidebar-happy while some aren't. A terminal is just fine with 80 columns, thank you...

What I've been doing many years now is getting a 80 column terminal/editor/im client/whatever on one side of the screen and other apps on what's left. Seems pretty near perfection :)

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#49
post #2

Am I the only one who hardly sees any value in window managers? About 99% of the time, I'm wanting only one window visible at a time, with others quickly accessible via cmd-tab and cmd=`.

I almost always want only one window available (except terminals) - but don't want to have to think how to get to the other ones. When doing web development, I generally have some terminals open, my editor, and my web browser. If I use alt-tab, I need to remember which window I came from most recently - with xmonad, I _know_ alt-1 gets me to terminal, alt-2 to editor, alt-3 to web browser. It's minor but it is something I have to do hundreds of times each day, and avoiding the minor irritation of having alt/cmd-tabbed past the one I wanted is worth it.
Post reply on HN