Live data from Hacker News

Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

mauriciogardini.com

1–10 of 74 posts

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#3
This looks neat. I'm going to have to play around with it soon. As of now I've been using SizeUp, which is way less configurable, but great at giving you that top/left/right/bottom (and corners) placement you may be looking for.

http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#5
Back in the Dark Ages, before OS X was truly usable, I rocked ion on my FreeBSD machine and MachTEN (to run Emacs) on my Macs. This experience conditioned me to not fight the platform -- slate, as nice as it looks, seems to me a great deal like fighting the platform. Is it?

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#7
Looks neat, albeit for me personally it might be a little over the top.

I use Moom (http://manytricks.com/moom/) for quite a while and I'm happy with it so far as it integrates perfectly into the overall UI of OSX.

You have of course also convenient (and customizable) shortcuts for actions like 'Move & Zoom Window to Left Half', which is quite handy for example for webdevelopment on a smaller screen (Macbook), where you might want your browser to occupy one half and your editor the other half of the screen.

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#8
post #5

Back in the Dark Ages, before OS X was truly usable, I rocked ion on my FreeBSD machine and MachTEN (to run Emacs) on my Macs. This experience conditioned me to not fight the platform -- slate, as nice as it looks, seems to me a great deal like fighting the platform. Is it?

Maybe so. But I don't see a problem with that.

OSX window management currently satisfies average users, but not power users. And since power users are exactly the kind of people who can do something about it, they are doing it.

Re: Slate: a Mac OS X window manager for power users

#10
post #8
post #5

Back in the Dark Ages, before OS X was truly usable, I rocked ion on my FreeBSD machine and MachTEN (to run Emacs) on my Macs. This experience conditioned me to not fight the platform -- slate, as nice as it looks, seems to me a great deal like fighting the platform. Is it?

Maybe so. But I don't see a problem with that. OSX window management currently satisfies average users, but not power users. And since power users are exactly the kind of people who can do something about it, they are doing it.

I think the distinction between "power users" and "average users" is meaningless. A user is someone who derives utility from a given platform.
Post reply on HN