Live data from Hacker News

Posterous will turn off on April 30

blog.posterous.com

111–120 of 141 posts

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#111
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right! And when I wrote up that newsstand the time and noted that Posterous made it really hard to get your data out, as I recall I got a REALLY bitchy email from one of the founders.

We couldn't win either way. I got a super pissy email from David because he thought I was covering Posterous too much, as I think you recall.

Indeed! As you said, we were screwed either way!

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#112
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't compare Posterous to Tumblr in terms of user base. Tumblr is in top 50 websites in the world. I doubt that Posterous even cracked top 500.

Sure, but if they were able to get into the top 500 shouldn't that be a business worth more than $10m? Especially since it's user created content, and if they do it right they could keep rising in the ranks of top sites. I'm curious if they were experiencing a growth stall or even negative growth before selling. Because if they were growing, I don't understand why they would sell and abandon their product unless the…

When adding a single user add more costs than revenue, all growth is negative growth. That's part of the problem with many companies. Page views, traffic, and especially "users" do not necessarily translate into money.

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#113
post #99
post #38

This has only been mentioned once in the thread, but if Jekyll seems like too much work to setup, I highly, highly recommend Octopress: http://octopress.org/ It's based off of Jekyll but handles a lot of the boilerplate, including rake tasks to deploy to Github pages. I've been following the github/octopress project for awhile and have seen a lot of activity in the past few weeks, so hopefully version 2.1 is just aro…

I like the idea of Octopress and Jekyll, but the few times I've tried them, it seems that they don't easily scale. My blog has over 2900 entries. Build from scratch. chug chug chug That I understand. Now add a new entry and try to get an incremental rebuild in less than 30 seconds. Has anyone tackled this in either project??

I use a makefile. Only rebuilds the pages that have been added / modified (which, of course is the point of a makefile in general).

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#114
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Roll your own! It's fun. My site is a custom made file-based blogging platform written with Python Flask, and it's a joy to use since I made it exactly how I wanted it to be made. One feature that I really enjoy is being able to call source files into the post. This allows me to create/update code snippets extremely easily. Markdown + calling includes on my source files is exactly what I needed to efficiently produce…

What about bloggers that want to be developers? Can you do a writeup/tutorial for your setup?

I have a simple blog engine that can be readily deployed on Google App Engine - https://github.com/prakhar1989/CS253-Blag

It features Stvtle like blog post editing (distraction free), supports markdown and a draft system.

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#115

Can somebody please help me out? I'm confused here. I thought Posterous (before being acquired by Twitter) was doing quite well and was seen as the biggest competitor to Tumbler. It would seem that Posterous had a ton of users (would love to know details) and that they could monetize those users fairly simply through display ads. So, with a ton of users creating content and even more viewing that content, I would ima…

I think the issue here is simply Money In As an outside observer, it's easy enough to realize that Posterous could have monetized but that doesn't really answer the question of whether they could have monetized _enough_ to pay their ongoing costs. Most likely they were bleeding money at an extremely fast rate and probably running out, fast, which is why they sold for $10 million and over time under Twitter's wing wer…

From where I'm sitting, you hit the nail on the head.

They COULD have monetized, theoretically, but not once the die was cast.

Yes, lots of people have built CMS platform businesses where they charged money. But Posterous was probably, as you say, bleeding money, because they were not designed from day 1 to subsist on $12-49/mo subscriptions.

The choice of the "grow big or go home" model of startup results in a catch-22 when you cannot grow big, nor do you want to go home. The only thing you can fall back on is (if you're lucky) a 7 or very low 8 digit acquihire. Which is what this always has appeared to be:

http://unicornfree.com/2012/the-startup-graveyard-continues-...

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#116
I went the static site route (shout out to Blogofile (http://www.blogofile.com) because I didn't trust anyone but me to run my server and I got tired of running Wordpress and Drupal myself. I paid NearlyFreeSpeech.NET $20 a year ago to host the static files and have about half that still credited to my account.

OK, it's not for everyone. Initial setup certainly wasn't for the faint of heart. But it was fun and replacing my host is as easy as finding another cheap host for text files and jpegs. It was worth it to me.

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#117
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We couldn't win either way. I got a super pissy email from David because he thought I was covering Posterous too much, as I think you recall.

Indeed! As you said, we were screwed either way!

oh dear :/

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#118
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about developers who are also bloggers?

Roll your own! It's fun. My site is a custom made file-based blogging platform written with Python Flask, and it's a joy to use since I made it exactly how I wanted it to be made. One feature that I really enjoy is being able to call source files into the post. This allows me to create/update code snippets extremely easily. Markdown + calling includes on my source files is exactly what I needed to efficiently produce…

Wouldn't security be an issue?

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#119
post #31
post #3

Any solid alternatives HN could recommend?

Posthaven. If you liked Posterous, I promise you will like Posthaven. I was one of the cofounders of Posterous and wrote much of the site. Brett joined us as a cofounder and we really enjoyed working on it. The difference this time is that we'll be 100% sustainable, and we are pledging to keep the site online forever. It's just me and Brett coding it right now. http://posthaven.com

[deleted]

Re: Posterous will turn off on April 30

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about developers who are also bloggers?

To add to the different choices, use octopress [1] with github pages [2]. I was evaluating various choices when I decided to create my own blog, and I found it was the only solution that: 1. Does not cost me anything 2. Lets me use my custom domain name 3. Gives me control over the generated HTML, but also gives me a starting point in the form of some decent looking themes [3]. 4. Actually works (I'm looking at you,…

Toto & Heroku
Post reply on HN