I really wonder why GIFs are still around. Apart for being used as short videos for funny things they have not a huge use afaik. They really feel like an old technology. They are also a pain to support on android.
I think it's because of IE. I know IE sopports transparent PNGs for quite a while, but until not very long ago there were not so many options and people don't really like to upgrade IE apparently.
The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
31–40 of 111 posts
Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Webkit's stance is basically "we're only doing it if upstream libpng supports it" (because APNG support basically requires a couple hooks in libpng itself) but the libpng devs refuse to accept the patch for apng support because they are of the opinion that libpng should process only PNG, not derivative formats, which is what they consider APNG.
In fairness I can see it from the libpng guy's perspective. It will make their library larger and potentially less fit for a certain purpose. Why hasn't someone forked libpng, added the apng patch and then made it available for WebKit? Then everyone is happy. Just needs a middle-man.
Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#33Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#34Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#35Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#36"The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF" ... On the Web! PNG has been more popular than GIF since a very long time for basically anything non-web needing lossless picture compression. From smartphones icons to OS icons, software logos and icons, etc. I'd say the proportion is about 100:1. Actually I was suprised while just running a "find" on my Linux distro to even find a few .gif files. But thousand…
You can really save screenies in whatever format you like on linux with imagemagick.
It's just $ import -window root screenshot.
Unless you're referring to whatever the DE has implemented, but I've never taken an SS without using the terminal, so I have no idea.
Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#37Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#38What happened to JPEG 2000? It supports lossless too, but never seen it implemented on browsers.
As far as the actual quality:compression goes (both lossy and lossless), it kicked ass. But with so many free options, why bother?
Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#39And this particular circle is complete. Of course the patents that were the heart of such controversy are now expired so GIF code is no longer 'not-open' but it has a bad reputation so we don't play with it any more :-). I like PNG though, the library development, while a bit rocky at first, matured quite nicely and about 5 years ago crossed the point where enough people took the time to figure out how to use it that…
Re: The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF
#40"The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF" ... On the Web! PNG has been more popular than GIF since a very long time for basically anything non-web needing lossless picture compression. From smartphones icons to OS icons, software logos and icons, etc. I'd say the proportion is about 100:1. Actually I was suprised while just running a "find" on my Linux distro to even find a few .gif files. But thousand…