Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
jjinux.blogspot.com
Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#2Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#3Haskell for me.
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Applications_and_librarie...
Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#4Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#5Obviously both. But if you're looking to make an exclusive commitment for professional reasons, then I suspect Erlang is more industry and Haskell more academia.
Erlang is trendy Haskell is not.
Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#6Obviously both. But if you're looking to make an exclusive commitment for professional reasons, then I suspect Erlang is more industry and Haskell more academia.
I wonder if you had the same opinion about Erlang a year ago... Erlang is trendy Haskell is not.
I heard about Haskell through academic connections.
Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#7Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#8Haskell is more elegant, but erlang feels a bit more practical. In particular because of erlang's dynamic type system and symbols. If you are writing distributed software, erlang wins easily.
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/D...
I have played with it a bit, and haven't had the occasion to use it for anything important. Static typing is good enough for me. (And this is coming from someone who mostly programs Perl.)
Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#9What?
Re: Ask HN: Haskell or Erlang?
#10Haskell for me.
Agreed. It's more modern, more expressive, runs faster (and supports parallelism better, amusingly), and can talk to Erlang apps anyway. http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Applications_and_librarie...