> by @prianna
yet the link goes (correctly) to @piranna. It irks me to see people's names misspelled in attributions.
51–60 of 72 posts
> by @prianna
yet the link goes (correctly) to @piranna. It irks me to see people's names misspelled in attributions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Files are transferred as blob. Encryption can be dropped in if required. :)
Encryption ought to be standard. Making it optional means most people won't use it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Encryption ought to be standard. Making it optional means most people won't use it.
Encryption without authentication is (mostly) useless, and authentication is application-specific, so mandating encryption would have little effect.
If you're attributing, please make sure you spell people's names correctly: > by @prianna yet the link goes (correctly) to @piranna. It irks me to see people's names misspelled in attributions.
Why is everyone thinking about torrenting in browsers? I want a service where I can select a sensitive file, give my associate a link, and have that file transferred between our two computers without ever reaching an intermediate server. Does anyone know of a service like that, easy enough for my father to use?
Why is everyone thinking about torrenting in browsers? I want a service where I can select a sensitive file, give my associate a link, and have that file transferred between our two computers without ever reaching an intermediate server. Does anyone know of a service like that, easy enough for my father to use?
This does exactly this as of now.
EDIT: And it's all static HTML, fantastic! I just hosted it on my server, although there doesn't seem to be much of a reason to do that, since it's all static! Thanks a lot for this.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am using Chrome 24 on the desktop. Not working.
Refreshing should make it work. There is a lot of JavaScript which takes time to load up.
False and misleading title. _serverless_ file sharing says title, yet the technology "requires a HTTP server". "Its completely anonymous as no data is ever stored on the server". Incorrect, only mild protection against sniffing and spoofing is provided. The underlying code documentations speaks of "This makes it perfect for anonymity": https://github.com/ShirsenduK/WhatAreYouDownloading/tree/mas... No PKI is linked o…
False and misleading title. _serverless_ file sharing says title, yet the technology "requires a HTTP server". "Its completely anonymous as no data is ever stored on the server". Incorrect, only mild protection against sniffing and spoofing is provided. The underlying code documentations speaks of "This makes it perfect for anonymity": https://github.com/ShirsenduK/WhatAreYouDownloading/tree/mas... No PKI is linked o…
Sorry for the misleading title. By serverless I meant direct browser to browser file transfer with no server in between. Files are transferred directly. We need the HTTP Server to host the static webpage which facilitates the bridge. After all, its a browser based solution you need a page to visit. :). Services file dropbox can be used to host the static files and everyone can setup their own file transfer service. W…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This does exactly this as of now.
Great, I'll give it a go soon. I had a look but it can only share folders, not a single file. Otherwise, a very useful service! EDIT: And it's all static HTML, fantastic! I just hosted it on my server, although there doesn't seem to be much of a reason to do that, since it's all static! Thanks a lot for this.