Live data from Hacker News

A note from Keith

keithrabois.tumblr.com

21–30 of 165 posts

Re: A note from Keith

#21
Am I the only one that was confused about that last line of "already working on something new and hope to announce that in February"...

He's gone through something as traumatic as a lawsuit, a resignation, potential for trial, potential embarrassment of family, friends, colleagues all in the last two weeks... And his sign-off is that he has, in the midst of it all, already begun to work on a new startup?

Re: A note from Keith

#22
post #3

Proof of authenticity? Anyone could have registered that tumblr, and it has no other content. Please leave tabloid gossip to the tabloids until real information is available - and then leave it off HN.

Techcrunch has confirmed it. http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/25/rabois-left-square-over-sex...

Confirmed that he resigned is not the same as confirming he wrote the blog post.

Re: A note from Keith

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Techcrunch has confirmed it. http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/25/rabois-left-square-over-sex...

Confirmed that he resigned is not the same as confirming he wrote the blog post.

"Rabois has written an emotional post about the situation on his personal Tumblr. Here’s an excerpt:" - Techcrunch

Re: A note from Keith

#24
post #13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh? From what Keith says, his accuser is claiming that non-consensual acts occurred. Whether that is the case will be up to the courts to decide, but this is not just "Sex happens"

He said the suit alleges the relationship was not consensual. There's a difference, and I'm guessing it's oriented around the employment aspect.

Yes, you're right. The suit apparently alleges that the relationship itself was not consensual. However, that almost necessarily means that acts within that relationship, if they were seen as "necessary to keep the relationship going", would be non-consensual.

I don't mean rape (or else I think Keith's response would have a different approach). How Keith describes it, it could be anything relationship-related, just as sexual harassment does not necessarily involve sex.

Re: A note from Keith

#25
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please forgive me if I don't count coverage by Techcrunch as verification. Did he tweet it? Link from FB? Send a signed email? It could be legit, but the bar should be higher than this.

Every tech site is referencing it.

Wasn't there a post yesterday about how gaming sites reference sources because others do (without any due diligence)?

Re: A note from Keith

#26
post #21

Am I the only one that was confused about that last line of "already working on something new and hope to announce that in February"... He's gone through something as traumatic as a lawsuit, a resignation, potential for trial, potential embarrassment of family, friends, colleagues all in the last two weeks... And his sign-off is that he has, in the midst of it all, already begun to work on a new startup?

If so, there's not much I respect more than that.

Re: A note from Keith

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Confirmed that he resigned is not the same as confirming he wrote the blog post.

"Rabois has written an emotional post about the situation on his personal Tumblr. Here’s an excerpt:" - Techcrunch

Ah sorry, I must have missed that quote, but how does that connect to THAT blog?

[edit to add the question]

Re: A note from Keith

#28
post #21

Am I the only one that was confused about that last line of "already working on something new and hope to announce that in February"... He's gone through something as traumatic as a lawsuit, a resignation, potential for trial, potential embarrassment of family, friends, colleagues all in the last two weeks... And his sign-off is that he has, in the midst of it all, already begun to work on a new startup?

Maybe that's his therapy for coping. Would you rather him tear his clothes and put sackcloth on his waist?

Re: A note from Keith

#30
post #24
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He said the suit alleges the relationship was not consensual. There's a difference, and I'm guessing it's oriented around the employment aspect.

Yes, you're right. The suit apparently alleges that the relationship itself was not consensual. However, that almost necessarily means that acts within that relationship, if they were seen as "necessary to keep the relationship going", would be non-consensual. I don't mean rape (or else I think Keith's response would have a different approach). How Keith describes it, it could be anything relationship-related, just a…

Again, in any sexual facet not pertaining to rape, I find this news saddening.

If I were to enter into a relationship with you, and I said that the only way I would continue the relationship is if you kept it under wraps, then is that really qualification as sexual harassment?

The fact that we provide legal representation for people who have the choice to discontinue a relationship is beyond me.

Post reply on HN