A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node • Hacker News Board

Re: A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node

#41

Post by exemd » Sat, Jan 19, 2013, 3:58 AM UTC

Manic Digger, a C# open source clone of Minecraft and Ace of Spades, is also getting a WebGL version.

http://manicdigger.sourceforge.net/ - click "development news"

I make it with Script# (C# to JS converter), WebGL, and WebSockets. Both desktop OpenTK version and WebGL version can be compiled from common source.

But it's missing 2 weeks of work to finish the port.

Re: A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node

#42

Post by drivebyacct2 » Sat, Jan 19, 2013, 4:30 AM UTC

Is there a playable form of this somewhere? I spent a few minutes looking around...

Re: A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node

#43

Post by jontwist » Sat, Jan 19, 2013, 7:15 AM UTC

If only someone could turn this into a useful UI for dwarf fortress!

Re: A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node

#44

Post by substack » Sat, Jan 19, 2013, 7:34 AM UTC

And another new voxeljs module for portals: https://github.com/substack/voxel-portal http://substack.net/projects/voxel-portal/

Re: A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node

#45

Post by substack » Sat, Jan 19, 2013, 7:36 AM UTC

drivebyacct2 wrote: post #42

Is there a playable form of this somewhere? I spent a few minutes looking around...

Click on any of these demos: http://voxeljs.com/#gallery

Re: A Minecraft-like Block Based Game Engine Using Three.js, WebGL and Node

#46

Post by ferongr » Sat, Jan 19, 2013, 3:21 PM UTC

noxa wrote: post #40

ferongr wrote: post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To my knowledge Firefox has had support for IndexedDB for a long time without a vendor-prefix. Why does the page claim that it doesn't? Is there a bug in the implementation? A missing feature?

Firefox doesn't support IndexedDB in web workers yet, unfortunately. See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701634

Thank you for info and bug number.