Live data from Hacker News

Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 55 posts

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#21
post #20
post #2

I thought I heard that Mega was going to be partially funded by browser extensions that replace ads on third-party sites with Mega-affiliated ads. Is that not actually going to happen? It was the one part of the new Mega that sounded really shady.

You are thinking of Megabox which is supposedly[1] going to launch later this year. [1] http://torrentfreak.com/dotcoms-megabox-to-launch-a-few-mont...

Ah, thanks! I wasn't aware of the difference.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#22
post #5

Aren't we talking a lot about freemium models here? This thing is going to implode, there is no way it will ever break-even. There are three requirements any freemium model needs to meet to be successful. 1.) Large addressable market 2.) Minimal marginal costs per free user 3.) Enough features in premium tier to convert sizable portion of free users I think the only point 1 is met. Giving 50 GB of free storage to fre…

They will replicate their old business model from Megaupload. Pay people to upload and limit user on download. Like they did before but this time they cant be taken accountable for what a user uploads to their servers.

Last time they printet money this time they will do it again. Megaupload was the biggest Warez Hub on this planet and Mega will become the same. They dont care about being legal like Dropbox/Google Drive etc.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#23
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed and not to mention that most people won't use anything close to the 50GB, combine that with the deduplication plans they have and you have a very different scenario.

they say, all files will be client-side encrypted which won't allow them to "deduplicate" anything.

I don't think this is true. 50 GB of free storage for each user would be cost prohibitive without (at least) block-level deduplication.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#24
post #5

Aren't we talking a lot about freemium models here? This thing is going to implode, there is no way it will ever break-even. There are three requirements any freemium model needs to meet to be successful. 1.) Large addressable market 2.) Minimal marginal costs per free user 3.) Enough features in premium tier to convert sizable portion of free users I think the only point 1 is met. Giving 50 GB of free storage to fre…

They have all the experience to know how to run this business. The monetization will be regulated with bandwidth throttling.

It's typically just human nature to want everything NOW, so they'll pay for instant high-speed downloads. The free tier bandwidth will affect user acquisition and retention. If it's too slow, they'll hate it and never convert into a paying customer. After that, the affiliate stuff will take care of marketing costs and keeps the network virally expanding.

Most bandwidth-heavy sites could use the same monetization model... I think.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#25
From the mega website "Mega are looking for investors". Can someone explain why they'd do that? Kim has more than enough money to cover all of the costs of this site yet he'd rather get investors? I never understood when to use my own money or raise money for my startup.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#26
post #25

From the mega website "Mega are looking for investors". Can someone explain why they'd do that? Kim has more than enough money to cover all of the costs of this site yet he'd rather get investors? I never understood when to use my own money or raise money for my startup.

I think it's to reduce the risk, and maximize its potential. Unless your company is already successful, I think selling 49% is always a good idea.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#27
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed and not to mention that most people won't use anything close to the 50GB, combine that with the deduplication plans they have and you have a very different scenario.

they say, all files will be client-side encrypted which won't allow them to "deduplicate" anything.

Some kind of homomorphic encryption scheme maybe?

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#28

Am I the only one who just yawned when Megaupload was taken down? I have no ill-will towards the people who run or use that (or those types of) site, and I don't really like how the government handled the Megaupload thing, but with the proliferation of cloud storage sites hosted by Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Dropbox, etc., it just seems stupid to subject yourself to all the security issues, fake download buttons, ads…

MegaUpload fulfilled a very different purpose from those other sites. There were no security issues, that's pure FUD. And you could disable all ads by paying. Or by using JDownloader (free).

>MegaUpload fulfilled a very different purpose from those other sites.

Yeah. Piracy. That's why it isn't around anymore.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#29

What function does a half baked google docs clone serve here?

He's doing his best to be comparable to Google and it provides a thin veil of legitimacy. The core business will still be based around copyright infringement, this is all just "plausible denyablity" in action. Interesting to see how it plays out.

Re: Kim Dotcom’s Mega Opens For Early-Access Users

#30

Am I the only one who just yawned when Megaupload was taken down? I have no ill-will towards the people who run or use that (or those types of) site, and I don't really like how the government handled the Megaupload thing, but with the proliferation of cloud storage sites hosted by Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Dropbox, etc., it just seems stupid to subject yourself to all the security issues, fake download buttons, ads…

A few months after the takedown I went in search of a particular documentary that I knew existed. It's specific to a small subculture and a particular point in time; to the best of my knowledge it's never been released on DVD and most likely never will be. Arguably it would be no great loss to history if it were gone forever - but it was interesting to me. More than the big, famous things, it's little works like this that make up our culture.

I searched, and searched, and couldn't find it - just hundreds of dead links to Megaupload. There will be a copy in the BBC archives, but will anyone ever see it again? That experience makes me take Mega's side in all this.

(I eventually found it on an fserv that I swear was being hosted on dialup, but that's another story)

Post reply on HN