Live data from Hacker News

The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

mrmoneymustache.com

131–140 of 246 posts

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He's right that all savings are someone else's debt. But, if that is your big sticking point, you can literally load up on the cans of pork and beans as your retirement fund. "Savings account" is an abstraction for that, and it's important to realize how abstractions leak and fail, but for most people the abstraction is just fine.

Savings accounts are not abstractions for loading up on cans of pork and beans. If everyone simultaneously did that, then stopped working, everyone could still eat. If everyone put money into a savings account, then stopped working, they'd all starve. I think this is a deeply meaningful distinction. "Saving for retirement" in the modern financial sense is really more akin to having your kids take care of you when you…

"If everyone put money into a savings account, then stopped working, they'd all starve."

And if everyone doesn't do that, there is a very good chance you can withdraw your money and buy some pork and beans.

Which is the point about leaky abstractions. Unless you believe there is a significant chance your scenario will play out, the distinction isn't very meaningful.

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#132
post #105
post #52

MMM has a philosophy that is mathematically sound, and might even work for some people. Unfortunately, it's proven to fail for just about everyone (the spend less, save more advice has been around since the industrial revolution, and it isn't working to well: the average American has $16k in credit card debt). The reason it fails is because it ignores basic psychology. The key quote in this article is: >>But simply c…

Yours is a very pessimistic view. You have no faith in your fellow human beings. There are a lot of smart enough people out there with sufficient will power to make these changes in their life if only they have the education and awareness of the opportunities. Sometimes all it takes is seeing the impact these changes have. One of the best quotes I have seen about finances is this: Poor people spend what they have and…

Where can you buy a house for $5000 that pays out $500/month in rent?

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#133
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with the extremes of this logic is that if you scrimp and save and live poor to get to that 75% savings rate... you still have to live poor for the rest of your life on that 25% of your take home.

Nope. 10 years later you can go screw it all, and still have 35k in passive income a year and a huge nest egg. You're also probably think 35k in an expensive place, where he lives in a random suburb of boulder I think.

Or you could be dead in 10 years.

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#134

>If you save a reasonable percentage of your take-home pay, like 50%, and live on the remaining 50%, you’ll be Ready to Rock (aka “financially independent”) in a reasonable number of years – about 16 according to this chart In what universe is saving half your paycheck a reasonable percentage?

I save 65%. I make $48/hour and don't live in New York, LA, or San Francisco.

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#135
post #103
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the heart of it your quarrel with his program is that people have no willpower to change? I mean, you're very right in that we have a horrible track record but, in your opinion, is the advice sound should someone be able to adjust their lifestyle?

Of course people can change their lifestyle. I have no doubt that MMM and the extreme early retirement guy, and some of the devotees of those blogs, have done exactly that. That doesn't mean extreme frugality is the first thing people should focus on though. People have limited willpower. Using it to cut out $20/week worth of lattes or $100/month worth of cable just isn't the best use of it, unless you've already cov…

Maybe the relative ease and affluence of our lives has diminished our willpower to deny ourselves anything, and exercising our willpower will strengthen it.

In other words, maybe the 'limited' part is artificial and can be changed. And maybe strengthening our willpower would benefit us beyond just denying ourselves arbitrary comforts. Such as, willpower to pursue adding to or honing skills, maybe even ones that don't reap immediate material benefit.

So, cutting out lattes may make you better able to improve as an entrepreneur, or programmer, or whatever.

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminds me of a great article I saw posted on HN a few months ago. I wish I could remember where it was, but it basically said "You'll never get anywhere by skipping coffee and bringing lunch to work, focus on the big gains like increasing your salary by 30% instead". The frugal lifestyle BS most likely does more harm than good for the average person. People shouldn't be sacrificing quality of life because they're wo…

We should note how fortunate many of us are to be working in an industry where increasing your salary by 30% doesn't require a ton of extra work or going back to school and obtaining an advanced degree. For software developers, increasing your salary by 30% usually just requires: - A little extra work after-hours and weekends, improving on your craft. - Changing the company you work for. I don't think this is quite s…

True, but it's just one example of a bigger point. I.e. stop pinching pennies and aim for larger savings or gains instead.

Swizec posted the name of the guy who wrote the article I was thinking of, Ramit Sethi. Here's one where he talks a little about the issues with frugality: http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/save-on-coffee/

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#137
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are very few really reasonable assumptions over a 50 year timeframe. 5-7% ROI is not one of them, I'd say. On the other hand, you missed an important point: 4. "No longer working" isn't a permanent all-or-nothing decision. You can start working again if it becomes necessary for some reason (probably won't earn quite as much though). Or even keep working, just with fewer hours and/or a job that pays less but whi…

That's true, it's the flexibility to work exactly as much as you want--even if it's zero hours a year. In my own financial calculations, I also assume that I start collecting social security benefits when I turn 67. A lot of people consider that naive ("SS is going bankrupt!"), but I don't. So that'll be either a raise for my retirement income or at least a cushion to soften the losses I may have taken in the market…

I'm a big fan of MMM, but I'm also not from the US. From an external point of view, making any assumptions about United States pensions far in the future seems like a bad idea. The United States can barely pay interest on its foreign debt (debt ceiling/fiscal cliff debate), how do you expect it will be able to honor its national debt obligations without resorting to inflation?

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#138

The suggestion that I could, living in New York, both live off of half of my take home pay and retire early based on the amount I'd have in the bank after 16 years of doing so, is completely absurd

Why is it absurd? The former is completely based on a combination of income and lifestyle, so I can't argue with that.

However, the latter is just math. According to the article, if you save 50% and maintain your current lifestyle, assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, you'll be financially independent.

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminds me of a great article I saw posted on HN a few months ago. I wish I could remember where it was, but it basically said "You'll never get anywhere by skipping coffee and bringing lunch to work, focus on the big gains like increasing your salary by 30% instead". The frugal lifestyle BS most likely does more harm than good for the average person. People shouldn't be sacrificing quality of life because they're wo…

I agree. It reminds me of the story of a low income divorced father barely scraping by month to month, who could have used a several hundred dollar windfall to try his shot at a trade school or some such training program, but instead spent it on a fun weekend with his son when he had a couple days with him. Long term possibly maybe shot at improving his life slightly, or a good life experience with his son now... it'…

Don't want to make too much of your story but the father had a third option: use the money for the trade school and then say to his son, "Money's tight because I'm going back to school, so this weekend we're going camping (or taking a bus to the beach or watching DVDs from the library) instead of driving to Disneyland. Is that okay with you?"

Re: The Simple Math Behind Early Retirement

#140

MMM has an excellent philosophy, however following his methods and working toward early retirement does require a salary level that is a considerable amount above the minimum basic cost of living for where you are. By minimum cost of living I'm not talking about the average cost of a restaurant meal in one area/country vs another or the average cost of a cable tv package in one country vs another (if you consider tho…

TV licensing have a page for declaring you have no TV. https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/no-licence-needed/

I've never had (or needed) a TV license, and I've never been fined.

Post reply on HN