Live data from Hacker News

How to Be an Angel Investor

paulgraham.com

21–30 of 55 posts

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#21
post #19

Thank you for posting this. Is there a way I can view the Justin.Tv stream again? Youtube? Also, do angel investors ever go looking for deals, or is this a sign of a bad angel investor?

Is there a way I can view the Justin.Tv stream again?

It all gets archived:

http://www.justin.tv/clip/15489851960ba5d5

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#22
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If $24k for IP is bad advice, what do you think the right number would have been?

Yokum (one of the absolute best out there) quotes $5K as a barebones starter package. I'm sure he'd have helped us avoid overbuilding on the IP in addition to the overbuilding on the corporate stuff. http://www.startupcompanylawyer.com/faqs/ I refuse to believe you could get half as good as Yokum for twice the price.

He wouldn't remember it, but Yokum spent a good chunk of time on the phone with me and my cofounders when we started Matasano, as a favor for a mutual friend. I totally agree with you.

Having said that, I guess I was weaseling my way around to the point that a boilerplate IP agreement would cost next to nothing, and would probably be all you'd ever need. People obsess too much about IP, and not enough about their own execution risk.

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#23
I thought this was an interesting claim:

> Angels are the limiting reagent in startup formation.

I'd like to claim that I would have started startups even if YC didn't accept Xobni for the summer of 2006 class. I had already failed at a half-startup. I was doing consulting for another startup called Siteadvisor. Etc.

Yet YC was the catalyst for dropping out of grad school.

Paul certainly gets a unique view into startup creation. I just wonder what the second and third order terms are of this equation.

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yokum (one of the absolute best out there) quotes $5K as a barebones starter package. I'm sure he'd have helped us avoid overbuilding on the IP in addition to the overbuilding on the corporate stuff. http://www.startupcompanylawyer.com/faqs/ I refuse to believe you could get half as good as Yokum for twice the price.

He wouldn't remember it, but Yokum spent a good chunk of time on the phone with me and my cofounders when we started Matasano, as a favor for a mutual friend. I totally agree with you. Having said that, I guess I was weaseling my way around to the point that a boilerplate IP agreement would cost next to nothing, and would probably be all you'd ever need. People obsess too much about IP, and not enough about their own…

(I know it's uncool to say here, but we're applying for a patent on our transaction engine. Even in the patent process, we probably could have saved some cash.)

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#25
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He wouldn't remember it, but Yokum spent a good chunk of time on the phone with me and my cofounders when we started Matasano, as a favor for a mutual friend. I totally agree with you. Having said that, I guess I was weaseling my way around to the point that a boilerplate IP agreement would cost next to nothing, and would probably be all you'd ever need. People obsess too much about IP, and not enough about their own…

(I know it's uncool to say here, but we're applying for a patent on our transaction engine. Even in the patent process, we probably could have saved some cash.)

Uncool isn't the word I'd use. I've got patent applications from 7+ years ago, with reputable IP lawyers working for going concerns, that are still "pending". My snipe at you might be "pointlessness". ;)

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#26
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(I know it's uncool to say here, but we're applying for a patent on our transaction engine. Even in the patent process, we probably could have saved some cash.)

Uncool isn't the word I'd use. I've got patent applications from 7+ years ago, with reputable IP lawyers working for going concerns, that are still "pending". My snipe at you might be "pointlessness". ;)

(but I can see why you spent so much money on IP now; patents are expensive).

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#27
This essay and the associated talk happen to form a great object lesson in writing: record some people talking and transcribe it yourself. You learn complexities of human speech, proper use of punctuation, when to break the rules, how unbelievably much people talk, all sorts of good things.

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#28
post #26
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uncool isn't the word I'd use. I've got patent applications from 7+ years ago, with reputable IP lawyers working for going concerns, that are still "pending". My snipe at you might be "pointlessness". ;)

(but I can see why you spent so much money on IP now; patents are expensive).

Chicago investors kept telling me they would only invest in a company with "protectable IP." Coming from a healthcare VC background, I didn't question it. That was a mistake.

It is what it is at this point - so much money sunk into it that I want to finish it off.

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#29
post #2

I recommend founders read this too. It would be useful to them to imagine how things look from the investors' side. I'm surprised more didn't take advantage of the Justin.tv stream to spy on the investors at AngelConf. They were pretty candid about how they think.

I was looking through the legal documents just to get a sense of what technically happens when a corporation issues a new type of stock. Thanks for sharing these documents. Not sure if this is relevant, but http://ycombinator.com/seriesaa/aa-boardconsent.doc has a typo... there is no section 1.iii .. it skips to 1.iiii and then 1.iv.

You mean section 1.iii is misspelled as 1.iiii

Re: How to Be an Angel Investor

#30
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(but I can see why you spent so much money on IP now; patents are expensive).

Chicago investors kept telling me they would only invest in a company with "protectable IP." Coming from a healthcare VC background, I didn't question it. That was a mistake. It is what it is at this point - so much money sunk into it that I want to finish it off.

The alternative approach to this is trade secrets law --- we've advised trading firms (for instance) that go through some formality to demonstrate controls on trade secret information for exactly this reason. But you'd probably have been screwed on lawyers either way.

Best of luck with the project.

Post reply on HN