Graphing Air Pollution in China
kopf.github.com
Graphing Air Pollution in China
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#2it'd be even cooler if you could use data for some large, densely populated US cities as benchmarks, adjusted for time zone differences
I know anecdotally that the air in Chinese cities is bad, but I've never been really sure how much worse it is than say, LA, or NYC
Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#3Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#4Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#5Wondering what the massive, yet brief, spikes in Guangzhou are...the ceiling of the Hazardous category of the AQI is capped at 500. That would mean that readings like the 1/12/13 of 827 are quite literally 'off-the-chart.'
Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#6Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#7Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#8this is really cool! it'd be even cooler if you could use data for some large, densely populated US cities as benchmarks, adjusted for time zone differences I know anecdotally that the air in Chinese cities is bad, but I've never been really sure how much worse it is than say, LA, or NYC
http://www.aqmd.gov/smog/Forecast.htm
http://www3.aqmd.gov/webappl/aqdetail/AirQualityParameterDat...
Click on "Historical Data" to create a graph.
Bottom line, LA seems to hover around 25 µg/m³.
Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#9Wondering what the massive, yet brief, spikes in Guangzhou are...the ceiling of the Hazardous category of the AQI is capped at 500. That would mean that readings like the 1/12/13 of 827 are quite literally 'off-the-chart.'
The safe bet would be some atmospheric event that concentrated existing pollution. Any new pollution generation event would be expected to have more impact on the baseline, right?
Re: Graphing Air Pollution in China
#10Wondering what the massive, yet brief, spikes in Guangzhou are...the ceiling of the Hazardous category of the AQI is capped at 500. That would mean that readings like the 1/12/13 of 827 are quite literally 'off-the-chart.'
The safe bet would be some atmospheric event that concentrated existing pollution. Any new pollution generation event would be expected to have more impact on the baseline, right?