Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
lofgren.house.gov
Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
1–10 of 174 posts
Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#2http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/16njr9/im_rep_zo...
Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#3SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN VIOLATIONS OF AGREEMENTS OR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, RELATING TO INTERNET SERVICE, FROM THE PURVIEW OF CERTAIN CRIMINAL PROHIBITIONS. (a) FRAUD AND RELATED ACTIVITY IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTERS. - Section 1030(e)(6) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘alter;’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘alter, but does not include access in violation of an agreement or contractual obligation, such as an acceptable use policy or terms of service agreement, with an Internet service provider, Internet website, or employer, if such violation constitutes the sole basis for determining that access to a protected computer is unauthorized;’’.
(b) FRAUD BY WIRE, RADIO, OR TELEVISION. - Section 1343 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the following: ‘‘A violation of an agreement or contractual obligation regarding Internet or computer use, such as an acceptable use policy or terms of service agreement, with an Internet service provider, Internet website, or employer is not in itself a violation of this section.’’.
It essentially means that violating a TOS will not longer be considered "wire fraud".
The law, currently:
18 U.S.C. § 1030: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/47/1030
Summary: http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/tit...
18 U.S.C. § 1343: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/63/1343
Summary: http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/tit...
Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#4Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#5Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#6Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#7If you read Reason, you're immediately suspicious of laws with people's names on them; they're often more about PR than about well-thought-out policy changes.
Granick makes pretty good arguments that it's the sentencing structure of CFAA that creates the largest problems (a low evidentiary standard for establishing damages, not to mention the ridiculousness of criminal sentences that scale with the number of documents you download). But more importantly, prosecutorial misconduct is at the heart of this case. Surely we're going to do something about that, right?
Obviously, I don't think TOS violations should be felonies, for whatever that's worth. Lessig, on Reddit, says it's critically important.
Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#8It's a nice narrow fix and I hope it passes, but the real elephant in the room is 'plea bargaining.' That needs reform at the federal level.
Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#9Re: Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Aaron's Law [pdf]
#10Would Aaron's Law have helped Aaron? Both Orin Kerr and Jennifer Granick have said that his actions in evading filtering and shutoffs on MIT's networks would have created a plausible argument for the prosecution that he had been evading specific code-based authorization mechanisms and would have known his access was unauthorized. If you read Reason, you're immediately suspicious of laws with people's names on them; t…